StatesWest Airlines withdrew its offer to acquire Mesa Airlines. Was an offer made to acquire Mesa Airline? TimeBank (wsj_0321_orig.tml) Yes An offer was made to acquire Mesa_Airline . StatesWest Airlines withdrew its offer to acquire Mesa Airlines. Did StatesWest ever plan to acquire Mesa Airlines? TimeBank (wsj_0321_orig.tml Yes Lexical knowledge. StatesWest did plan to acquire Mesa_Airlines . StatesWest Airlines withdrew its offer to acquire Mesa Airlines. Did StatesWest acquire Mesa Airlines? TimeBank (wsj_0321_orig.tml No StatesWest did acquire Mesa_Airlines . Steynar Gil welcomed the release of prisoners imprisoned during the October 15-16 riots. Have prisoners imprisoned during October 15-16 riots been released? Google Yes One reading. There is another reading of the sentence in which there is a positive intention of release. Prisoners imprisoned during October 15-16 riots have been released . Program trading is hurting the market's efforts to bring back small investors. Are there any efforts to bring back small investors? TimeBank (wsj_0585_orig.tml) Yes There are some efforts to bring back small investors . Thirty-two of the 159 U.N. members were honoring the sanctions against Iraq. Were there sanctions against Iraq? TimeBank (AP900816-0139.tml) Yes There were sanctions against Iraq . Herbicide use in some areas of the U.S. was delayed earlier in the year by heavy rains. Were herbicides delayed in all areas of the U.S. this year? TimeBank (wsj_0918_orig.tml) No Herbicides delayed were in all areas of the U.S. this year . Herbicide use in some areas of the U.S. was prevented this year because of heavy rains. Were herbicides used this year in the U.S.? TimeBank (wsj_0918_orig.tml) Yes Conversational implicature. Namely, if it is reported that p does not happen in some areas, that let us assume that p happens in other areas. Herbicides were used this year in the U.S. . The US is bolstering its military presence in the Gulf. Does the US have a military presence in the Gulf. TimeBank (PRI19980205.2000.1890.tml) Yes The US does have a military presence in the Gulf . The unemployed took to the streets of the German capital, Berlin, mirroring protests around the country. Were the protests only in Berlin? TimeBank (PRI19980205.2000.1998.tml) No The protests were only in Berlin . The court nullified a standstill agreement between DPC Acquisition and Dataproducts. Was there any agreement between DPC Acquisition and Dataproducts? TimeBank (wsj_0661_orig.tml) Yes There was some agreement between DPC_Acquisition and Dataproducts . The court nullified a standstill agreement between DPC Acquisition and Dataproducts. Are there any agreements between DCP Acquisition and Dataproducts? TimeBank (wsj_0661_orig.tml) No No There are some agreements between DCP_Acquisition and Dataproducts . Sardar Patel faced imprisonment for the first time when he was assisting Gandhiji in the Salt Satyagraha. Was Sardar Patel ever in prison? Google Don't know One reading. We don't know whether he ended up in prison and the question refers to that possible imprisonment (see next interpretation). No One reading. The question has an implicit 'before' and therefore is asking about previous possible imprisonments that hadn't taken place. Sardar_Patel was in prison . Sardar Patel faced imprisonment for the first time when he was assisting Gandhiji in the Salt Satyagraha. Was Sardar Patel ever convicted of a crime? Google Yes Yes Usually when you are imprisoned you are convicted of something. Sardar_Patel was convicted of a crime . Darryl Strawberry recently avoided imprisonment when a judge sentenced him to a drug treatment center for violating his probation. Was Darryl Strawberry ever in prison? Google No Darryl_Strawberry was in prison . Darryl Strawberry recently avoided imprisonment when a judge sentenced him to a drug treatment center for violating his probation. Was Darryl imprisoned for violating his probation? Google No Darryl imprisoned for was violating his probation . Three patients declined further surgery. Did the patients have any surgeries? Google Yes The patients did have some surgeries . Foodstuffs are being blocked from entry into Iraq. Are foodstuffs getting into Iraq? TimeBank (AP900816-0139.tml) No Foodstuffs are getting into Iraq . The new space allowed Compaq to increase the manufacturing capacity of its plant in Erskine, Scotland. Did Compaq increase its manufacturing capacity in the Erskine plant? TimeBank (wsj_0904_orig.tml) Yes Compaq did increase its manufacturing capacity in the Erskine plant . Holders of more than a majority of the stock of the company have approved the transaction by written consent. Has the transaction taken place? TimeBank (wsj_0122_orig.tml) Yes The transaction has taken place . The transaction has been approved by Kyle's board but requires the approval of the company's shareholders. Has the transaction taken place? TimeBank (wsj_0923_orig.tml) No The transaction has taken place . The company's board authorized the purchase of an additional one million shares. Has the company purchased additional shares? TimeBank (wsj_0520_orig.tml) Don't know Yes Usually authorization of a purchase usually leads to the actual purchase. The company has purchased additional shares . The purchase was subsequently rejected by regulators. Did the purchase take place? TimeBank (wsj_0938_orig.tml) No The purchase did take place . Analysts were predicting 1990 BellSouth earnings in the range of $3.90 a share. Has BellSouth experienced earnings in 1990? TimeBank (wsj_0584_orig.tml) Don't know BellSouth has experienced earnings in 1990 . Milton Roy disclosed in May that it was approached for a possible acquisition by Thermo Electron. Was Milton Roy approached by Thermo Electron? TimeBank (wsj_0570_orig.tml) Yes Milton_Roy approached was by Thermo_Electron . Milton Roy disclosed in May that it was approached for a possible acquisition by Thermo Electron. Has Milton Roy been acquired by Thermo Electron? TimeBank (wsj_0570_orig.tml) Don't know Milton_Roy has been acquired by Thermo_Electron . Analysts noted that over the past 20 years, Mr. Fournier has built his company through astute stock-market activity. Has Mr. Fournier built his company through astute stock-market activity? TimeBank (wsj_0810_orig.tml) Yes Yes Mr._Fournier has built his company through astute stock-market activity . I was pleased that Ms. Currie's lawyers stated unambiguously this morning that she's not aware of any unethical conduct. Is Ms. Currie aware of any unethical conduct on her part? TimeBank (NYT19980206.0466.tml) Don't know No Ms._Currie is aware of some unethical conduct on her part . I was pleased that Ms. Currie's lawyers stated unambiguously this morning that she's not aware of any unethical conduct. Have Ms. Currie’s lawyers stated she’s not aware of any unethical conduct? TimeBank (NYT19980206.0466.tml) Yes Ms._Currie 's lawyers have stated she 's not aware of some unethical conduct . President Clinton and Blair will stand together on arresting the terrorists suspected of blowing up Pan Am flight 103 over Scotland. Has there been an explosion of a Pan Am flight over Scotland? TimeBank (APW19980227.0476.tml) Yes There was a flight Pan Am 103 explosion. There has been an explosion of a Pan Am flight over Scotland . The accord helps RJR pay off debt. Does RJR have any debt? TimeBank (wsj_0675_orig.tml) Yes In the non-generic interpretation of the proposition. RJR does have some debt . 48 Kuwaiti jet fighters managed to escape the Iraqi invasion. Did any Kuwaiti jet fighters escape the Iraqi invasion? TimeBank (WSJ900813-0157.tml) Yes Some Kuwaiti jet did fighters escape the Iraqi invasion . It appears that allied troops haven't yet fully engaged Iraq's Republican Guard. Have allied troops engaged Iraq’s Republican Guard? TimeBank (WSJ910225-0066.tml) Don't know Allied troops have engaged Iraq 's Republican Guard . British police officers concluded Howes had probably been killed soon after being captured. Did Howes die? TimeBank (APW19980219.0476.tml) Yes One interpretation: 'probably' scoping over the temporal relation between the killing and the capture. Howes did die . British police officers concluded Howes had probably been killed soon after being captured. Was Howes killed soon after being captured? TimeBank (APW19980219.0476.tml) Yes Howes killed soon after was being captured . The police allowed the crowd to demonstrate on nearby streets. Did the crowd demonstrate on nearby streets? TimeBank (APW19980308.0201.tml) Yes The crowd did demonstrate on nearby streets . In Pakistan, the Taliban have forbidden women to work. Do the Taliban want women to work in Pakistan? TimeBank (VOA19980305.1800.2603.tml) No No Conventional implicature. The Taliban do want women to work in Pakistan . In Pakistan, the Taliban have forbidden women to work. Do women work in Pakistan? TimeBank (VOA19980305.1800.2603.tml) No Women do work in Pakistan . The Administration is trying to decide whether Saddam Hussein has WMD. Is the administration deciding whether Saddam Hussein has WMD? TimeBank (WSJ900813-0157.tml) Yes The administration is deciding whether Saddam_Hussein has WMD . Helicopters are trying to locate people stranded without food. Are helicopters locating people stranded without food? TimeBank (ed980111.1130.0089.tml) Don't know Helicopters are locating people stranded without food . MCA agreed to wait on purchasing Cineplex. Is MCA waiting to purchase Cineplex? TimeBank (wsj_0938_orig.tml) Yes MCA is waiting to purchase Cineplex . MGM Grand Inc. has agreed to pay $93 million to buy 117 acres of land in Las Vegas. Has MGM Grand Inc. paid $93 million to buy 117 acres of land in Las Vegas? TimeBank (wsj_0981_orig.tml) Don't know MGM_Grand_Inc. has paid $ 93 million to buy 117 acres of land in Las_Vegas . StatesWest Airlines withdrew its offer to acquire Mesa Airlines. StatesWest Airlines withdrew its offer to acquire Mesa Airlines . StatesWest_Airlines NNP StatesWest_Airlin stateswest NNP 0 ORGANIZATION withdrew VBD withdrew withdraw 0.111111111111111 its PRP$ it its offer NN offer offer 0.0769230769230769 to TO to to acquire VB acquir acquire 0.037037037037037 Mesa_Airlines NNP Mesa_Airlin mesa NNP 1 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP StatesWest_Airlines)) (VP (VBD withdrew) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN offer) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB acquire) (NP (NNP Mesa_Airlines))))))) (. .)) nsubj 2 1 poss 4 3 dobj 2 4 aux 6 5 infmod 4 6 dobj 6 7 2 4 2 1 6 7 6 1 Was an offer made to acquire Mesa Airline? An offer was made to acquire Mesa_Airline . An DT An an offer NN offer offer 0.0769230769230769 was VBZ wa be made VBN made make 0.00161550888529887 to TO to to acquire VB acquir acquire 0.037037037037037 Mesa_Airline NNP Mesa_Airlin mesa . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT An) (NN offer)) (VP (VBZ was) (VP (VBN made) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB acquire) (NP (NNP Mesa_Airline))))))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubjpass 4 2 xsubj 6 2 auxpass 4 3 aux 6 5 purpcl 4 6 xcomp 4 6 dobj 6 7 3 2 4 6 4 2 6 7 6 2 StatesWest Airlines withdrew its offer to acquire Mesa Airlines. StatesWest Airlines withdrew its offer to acquire Mesa Airlines . StatesWest_Airlines NNP StatesWest_Airlin stateswest NNP 0 ORGANIZATION withdrew VBD withdrew withdraw 0.111111111111111 its PRP$ it its offer NN offer offer 0.0769230769230769 to TO to to acquire VB acquir acquire 0.037037037037037 Mesa_Airlines NNP Mesa_Airlin mesa NNP 1 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP StatesWest_Airlines)) (VP (VBD withdrew) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN offer) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB acquire) (NP (NNP Mesa_Airlines))))))) (. .)) nsubj 2 1 poss 4 3 dobj 2 4 aux 6 5 infmod 4 6 dobj 6 7 2 4 2 1 6 7 6 1 Did StatesWest ever plan to acquire Mesa Airlines? StatesWest did plan to acquire Mesa_Airlines . StatesWest NNP StatesWest StatesWest NNP 0 ORGANIZATION did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 plan VB plan plan 0.0625 to TO to to acquire VB acquir acquire 0.037037037037037 Mesa_Airlines NNS Mesa_Airlin mesa . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP StatesWest)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB plan) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB acquire) (NP (NNS Mesa_Airlines))))))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 xsubj 5 1 aux 3 2 aux 5 4 purpcl 3 5 xcomp 3 5 dobj 5 6 2 3 2 1 3 5 3 1 5 6 5 1 StatesWest Airlines withdrew its offer to acquire Mesa Airlines. StatesWest Airlines withdrew its offer to acquire Mesa Airlines . StatesWest_Airlines NNP StatesWest_Airlin stateswest NNP 0 ORGANIZATION withdrew VBD withdrew withdraw 0.111111111111111 its PRP$ it its offer NN offer offer 0.0769230769230769 to TO to to acquire VB acquir acquire 0.037037037037037 Mesa_Airlines NNP Mesa_Airlin mesa NNP 1 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP StatesWest_Airlines)) (VP (VBD withdrew) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN offer) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB acquire) (NP (NNP Mesa_Airlines))))))) (. .)) nsubj 2 1 poss 4 3 dobj 2 4 aux 6 5 infmod 4 6 dobj 6 7 2 1 2 4 6 7 6 1 Did StatesWest acquire Mesa Airlines? StatesWest did acquire Mesa_Airlines . StatesWest NNP StatesWest StatesWest NNP 0 ORGANIZATION did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 acquire VB acquir acquire 0.037037037037037 Mesa_Airlines NNS Mesa_Airlin mesa . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP StatesWest)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB acquire) (NP (NNS Mesa_Airlines)))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 dobj 3 4 2 1 2 3 3 1 3 4 Steynar Gil welcomed the release of prisoners imprisoned during the October 15-16 riots. Steynar Gil welcomed the release of prisoners imprisoned during the October 15-16 riots . Steynar_Gil NNP Steynar_Gil steynar NNP 0 PERSON welcomed VBD welcom welcome 0.166666666666667 the DT the the release NN releas release 0.037037037037037 of IN of of prisoners NNS prison prisoner 0.05 imprisoned VBN imprison imprison 0.25 during IN dure during the DT the the October NNP October October 15-16 CD 15-16 15-16 riots NNS riot riot 1.0 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Steynar_Gil)) (VP (VBD welcomed) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN release)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS prisoners)) (VP (VBN imprisoned) (PP (IN during) (NP (DT the) (NNP October) (CD 15-16) (NNS riots)))))))) (. .)) IN_of 4 6 IN_during 7 12 nsubj 2 1 det 4 3 dobj 2 4 partmod 6 7 det 12 9 dep 12 10 num 12 11 2 4 2 1 7 6 7 12 Have prisoners imprisoned during October 15-16 riots been released? Prisoners imprisoned during October 15-16 riots have been released . Prisoners NNS Prison prisoners 0.05 imprisoned VBN imprison imprison 0.25 during IN dure during October NNP October October 15-16 CD 15-16 15-16 riots NNS riot riot 1.0 have VBP have have 4.44839857651246E-4 been VBN been be 1.0 released VBN releas release 0.0555555555555556 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Prisoners)) (VP (VBN imprisoned) (PP (IN during) (NP (NNP October) (CD 15-16) (NNS riots))))) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN released)))) (. .)) IN_during 2 6 nsubjpass 9 1 partmod 1 2 dep 6 4 num 6 5 aux 9 7 auxpass 9 8 2 1 2 6 7 1 7 9 8 9 8 1 9 1 Program trading is hurting the market's efforts to bring back small investors. Program trading is hurting the market 's efforts to bring back small investors . Program_trading NN Program_trad program is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 hurting VBG hurt hurt 0.333333333333333 the DT the the market NN market market 0.00666666666666667 's POS 's 's efforts NNS effort effort 0.0078125 to TO to to bring_back VB bring_back bring small JJ small small 0.00186219739292365 investors NNS investor investor 0.0625 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NN Program_trading)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG hurting) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN market) (POS 's)) (NNS efforts) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB bring_back) (NP (JJ small) (NNS investors)))))))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 det 5 4 poss 7 5 dobj 3 7 aux 9 8 infmod 7 9 amod 11 10 dobj 9 11 2 3 2 1 3 1 3 7 9 11 9 5 Are there any efforts to bring back small investors? There are some efforts to bring back small investors . There EX There there 4.86381322957198E-4 are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 some DT some some efforts NNS effort effort 0.0078125 to TO to to bring_back VB bring_back bring small JJ small small 0.00186219739292365 investors NNS investor investor 0.0625 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (DT some) (NNS efforts) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB bring_back) (NP (JJ small) (NNS investors))))))) (. .)) nsubj 4 1 cop 4 2 det 4 3 aux 6 5 infmod 4 6 amod 8 7 dobj 6 8 2 4 6 8 Thirty-two of the 159 U.N. members were honoring the sanctions against Iraq. Thirty-two of the 159 U.N. members were honoring the sanctions against Iraq . Thirty-two NN Thirty-two thirty-two of IN of of the DT the the 159 NNP 159 159 U.N. NNP U.N. U.N. NNP 0 ORGANIZATION members NNS member member 0.0031055900621118 were VBD were be honoring VBG honor honor 0.125 the DT the the sanctions NNS sanction sanction 0.166666666666667 against IN against against Iraq NNP Iraq Iraq NNP 1 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN Thirty-two)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP 159) (NNP U.N.) (NNS members)))) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBG honoring) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS sanctions)) (PP (IN against) (NP (NNP Iraq)))))) (. .)) IN_of 1 6 IN_against 10 12 nsubj 8 1 det 6 3 nn 6 4 nn 6 5 aux 8 7 det 10 9 dobj 8 10 7 1 7 8 8 1 8 10 Were there sanctions against Iraq? There were sanctions against Iraq . There EX There there 4.86381322957198E-4 were VBD were be sanctions NNS sanction sanction 0.166666666666667 against IN against against Iraq NNP Iraq Iraq NNP 0 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD were) (NP (NP (NNS sanctions)) (PP (IN against) (NP (NNP Iraq))))) (. .)) IN_against 3 5 nsubj 3 1 cop 3 2 2 1 2 3 Herbicide use in some areas of the U.S. was delayed earlier in the year by heavy rains. Herbicide use in some areas of the U.S. was delayed earlier in the year by heavy rains . Herbicide JJ Herbicid herbicide use NN us use 0.00273224043715847 in IN in in some DT some some areas NNS area area 0.00427350427350427 of IN of of the DT the the U.S. NNP U.S. U.S. NNP 0 LOCATION was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 delayed VBN delai delay 0.0666666666666667 earlier RB earlier earlier 0.0333333333333333 in IN in in the DT the the year NN year year 0.00127551020408163 by IN by by heavy JJ heavi heavy 0.00869565217391304 rains NNS rain rain 0.333333333333333 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJ Herbicide) (NN use)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT some) (NNS areas)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP U.S.)))))) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN delayed) (ADVP (RB earlier) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN year)))) (PP (IN by) (NP (JJ heavy) (NNS rains))))) (. .)) IN_in 2 5 IN_of 5 8 IN_in 11 14 agent 10 17 amod 2 1 nsubjpass 10 2 det 5 4 det 8 7 auxpass 10 9 advmod 10 11 det 14 13 amod 17 16 9 10 9 2 10 11 10 17 10 2 Were herbicides delayed in all areas of the U.S. this year? Herbicides delayed were in all areas of the U.S. this year . Herbicides NNS Herbicid herbicides delayed VBN delai delay 0.0666666666666667 were VBD were be in IN in in all DT all all areas NNS area area 0.00427350427350427 of IN of of the DT the the U.S. NNP U.S. U.S. NNP 0 LOCATION this DT thi this DT 1 DATE 01/01/1000 year NN year year 0.00127551020408163 NN 2 DATE 01/01/1000 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Herbicides)) (VP (VBN delayed))) (VP (VBD were) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT all) (NNS areas)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP U.S.))))) (NP-TMP (DT this) (NN year))) (. .)) IN_in 11 6 IN_of 6 9 nsubj 11 1 partmod 1 2 dep 11 3 det 6 5 det 9 8 det 11 10 2 1 3 1 3 6 Herbicide use in some areas of the U.S. was prevented this year because of heavy rains. Herbicide use in some areas of the U.S. was prevented this year because of heavy rains . Herbicide JJ Herbicid herbicide use NN us use 0.00273224043715847 in IN in in some DT some some areas NNS area area 0.00427350427350427 of IN of of the DT the the U.S. NNP U.S. U.S. NNP 0 LOCATION was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 prevented VBN prevent prevent 0.0666666666666667 this DT thi this DT 1 DATE 01/01/1000 year NN year year 0.00127551020408163 NN 2 DATE 01/01/1000 because RB becaus because 0.0588235294117647 of IN of of heavy JJ heavi heavy 0.00869565217391304 rains NNS rain rain 0.333333333333333 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJ Herbicide) (NN use)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT some) (NNS areas)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP U.S.)))))) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN prevented) (NP (NP (DT this) (NN year)) (PP (RB because) (IN of) (NP (JJ heavy) (NNS rains)))))) (. .)) IN_in 2 5 IN_of 5 8 IN_of 12 16 amod 2 1 nsubjpass 10 2 det 5 4 det 8 7 auxpass 10 9 det 12 11 dobj 10 12 dep 12 13 amod 16 15 9 2 9 10 10 12 10 2 Were herbicides used this year in the U.S.? Herbicides were used this year in the U.S. . Herbicides NNS Herbicid herbicides were VBD were be used VBN us use 0.0021551724137931 this DT thi this DT 0 DATE 01/01/1000 year NN year year 0.00127551020408163 NN 1 DATE 01/01/1000 in IN in in the DT the the U.S. NNP U.S. U.S. NNP 2 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Herbicides)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN used) (NP-TMP (DT this) (NN year)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP U.S.))))) (. .)) IN_in 3 8 nsubjpass 3 1 auxpass 3 2 det 5 4 tmod 3 5 det 8 7 2 1 2 3 3 1 3 8 The US is bolstering its military presence in the Gulf. The US is bolstering its military presence in the Gulf . The DT The the US NNP US US NNP 0 LOCATION is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 bolstering VBG bolster bolster 1.0 its PRP$ it its military JJ militari military 0.00495049504950495 presence NN presenc presence 0.0131578947368421 in IN in in the DT the the Gulf NNP Gulf Gulf NNP 1 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP US)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG bolstering) (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ military) (NN presence)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Gulf))))) (. .)) IN_in 4 10 det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 poss 7 5 amod 7 6 dobj 4 7 det 10 9 3 4 3 2 4 2 4 10 4 7 Does the US have a military presence in the Gulf. The US does have a military presence in the Gulf . The DT The the US NNP US US NNP 0 LOCATION does VBZ doe do 0.00215982721382289 have VB have have 5.98802395209581E-4 a DT a a military JJ militari military 0.00495049504950495 presence NN presenc presence 0.0131578947368421 in IN in in the DT the the Gulf NNP Gulf Gulf NNP 1 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP US)) (VP (VBZ does) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ military) (NN presence)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Gulf)))))) (. .)) IN_in 7 10 det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 det 7 5 amod 7 6 dobj 4 7 det 10 9 3 2 3 4 4 7 4 2 The unemployed took to the streets of the German capital, Berlin, mirroring protests around the country. The unemployed took to the streets of the German capital , Berlin , mirroring protests around the country . The DT The the unemployed JJ unemploi unemployed 0.2 took VBD took take 0.00235849056603774 to TO to to the_streets NNS the_street the of IN of of the DT the the German_capital NN German_capit german NN 0 LOCATION , , , , Berlin NNP Berlin Berlin NNP 1 LOCATION , , , , mirroring NN mirror mirroring protests NNS protest protest 0.125 around IN around around the DT the the country NN countri country 0.00317460317460317 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ unemployed)) (VP (VBD took) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNS the_streets)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN German_capital)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Berlin)) (, ,) (NP (NN mirroring) (NNS protests))))))) (PP (IN around) (NP (DT the) (NN country)))) (. .)) IN_to 3 5 IN_of 5 8 IN_around 3 16 det 2 1 nsubj 3 2 det 8 7 appos 8 10 nn 13 12 appos 10 13 det 16 15 3 16 3 5 3 2 Were the protests only in Berlin? The protests were only in Berlin . The DT The the protests NNS protest protest 0.125 were VBD were be only RB onli only 6.88231245698555E-4 in IN in in Berlin NNP Berlin Berlin NNP 0 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS protests)) (VP (VBD were) (ADVP (RB only)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Berlin)))) (. .)) IN_in 3 6 det 2 1 nsubj 3 2 advmod 3 4 3 2 3 4 3 6 The court nullified a standstill agreement between DPC Acquisition and Dataproducts. The court nullified a standstill agreement between DPC Acquisition and Dataproducts . The DT The the court NN court court 0.00793650793650794 nullified VBN nullifi nullify 1.0 a DT a a standstill JJ standstil standstill agreement NN agreement agreement 0.00970873786407767 between IN between between DPC_Acquisition NNP DPC_Acquisit dpc NNP 0 ORGANIZATION and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 Dataproducts NNP Dataproduct Dataproducts NNP 1 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN court)) (VP (VBN nullified) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ standstill) (NN agreement)) (PP (IN between) (NP (NNP DPC_Acquisition) (CC and) (NNP Dataproducts))))) (. .)) IN_between 6 8 det 2 1 nsubj 3 2 det 6 4 amod 6 5 dobj 3 6 and 8 10 3 6 3 2 Was there any agreement between DPC Acquisition and Dataproducts? There was some agreement between DPC_Acquisition and Dataproducts . There EX There there 4.86381322957198E-4 was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 some DT some some agreement NN agreement agreement 0.00970873786407767 between IN between between DPC_Acquisition NNP DPC_Acquisit dpc and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 Dataproducts NNP Dataproduct Dataproducts NNP 0 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT some) (NN agreement)) (PP (IN between) (NP (NNP DPC_Acquisition) (CC and) (NNP Dataproducts))))) (. .)) IN_between 4 6 nsubj 4 1 cop 4 2 det 4 3 and 6 8 2 4 The court nullified a standstill agreement between DPC Acquisition and Dataproducts. The court nullified a standstill agreement between DPC Acquisition and Dataproducts . The DT The the court NN court court 0.00793650793650794 nullified VBN nullifi nullify 1.0 a DT a a standstill JJ standstil standstill agreement NN agreement agreement 0.00970873786407767 between IN between between DPC_Acquisition NNP DPC_Acquisit dpc NNP 0 ORGANIZATION and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 Dataproducts NNP Dataproduct Dataproducts NNP 1 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN court)) (VP (VBN nullified) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ standstill) (NN agreement)) (PP (IN between) (NP (NNP DPC_Acquisition) (CC and) (NNP Dataproducts))))) (. .)) IN_between 6 8 det 2 1 nsubj 3 2 det 6 4 amod 6 5 dobj 3 6 and 8 10 3 2 3 6 Are there any agreements between DCP Acquisition and Dataproducts? There are some agreements between DCP_Acquisition and Dataproducts . There EX There there 4.86381322957198E-4 are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 some DT some some agreements VBN agreement agreement between IN between between DCP_Acquisition NNP DCP_Acquisit dcp and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 Dataproducts NNP Dataproduct Dataproducts NNP 0 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT some)) (VP (VBN agreements) (PP (IN between) (NP (NNP DCP_Acquisition) (CC and) (NNP Dataproducts)))))) (. .)) IN_between 4 6 nsubj 3 1 cop 3 2 partmod 3 4 and 6 8 2 3 4 6 4 3 Sardar Patel faced imprisonment for the first time when he was assisting Gandhiji in the Salt Satyagraha. Sardar Patel faced imprisonment for the first time when he was assisting Gandhiji in the Salt Satyagraha . Sardar_Patel NNP Sardar_Patel sardar NNP 0 PERSON faced VBD face face 0.032258064516129 imprisonment NN imprison imprisonment 0.25 for IN for for the DT the the first JJ first first 9.87166831194472E-4 time NN time time 6.07164541590771E-4 when WRB when when 4.30292598967298E-4 he PRP he he was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 assisting VBG assist assist 0.166666666666667 Gandhiji NNP Gandhiji Gandhiji NNP 1 PERSON in IN in in the DT the the Salt_Satyagraha NNP Salt_Satyagraha salt NNP 2 PERSON . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Sardar_Patel)) (VP (VBD faced) (NP (NN imprisonment)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJ first) (NN time))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG assisting) (NP (NP (NNP Gandhiji)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Salt_Satyagraha))))))))) (. .)) IN_for 2 7 IN_in 12 15 nsubj 2 1 dobj 2 3 det 7 5 amod 7 6 advmod 11 8 nsubj 11 9 aux 11 10 dep 2 11 dobj 11 12 det 15 14 2 1 2 3 2 11 2 7 10 9 10 11 11 12 11 9 Was Sardar Patel ever in prison? Sardar_Patel was in prison . Sardar_Patel NNP Sardar_Patel sardar was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 in IN in in prison NN prison prison 0.024390243902439 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Sardar_Patel)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN prison)))) (. .)) IN_in 2 4 nsubj 2 1 2 4 2 1 Sardar Patel faced imprisonment for the first time when he was assisting Gandhiji in the Salt Satyagraha. Sardar Patel faced imprisonment for the first time when he was assisting Gandhiji in the Salt Satyagraha . Sardar_Patel NNP Sardar_Patel sardar NNP 0 PERSON faced VBD face face 0.032258064516129 imprisonment NN imprison imprisonment 0.25 for IN for for the DT the the first JJ first first 9.87166831194472E-4 time NN time time 6.07164541590771E-4 when WRB when when 4.30292598967298E-4 he PRP he he was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 assisting VBG assist assist 0.166666666666667 Gandhiji NNP Gandhiji Gandhiji NNP 1 PERSON in IN in in the DT the the Salt_Satyagraha NNP Salt_Satyagraha salt NNP 2 PERSON . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Sardar_Patel)) (VP (VBD faced) (NP (NN imprisonment)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJ first) (NN time))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG assisting) (NP (NP (NNP Gandhiji)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Salt_Satyagraha))))))))) (. .)) IN_for 2 7 IN_in 12 15 nsubj 2 1 dobj 2 3 det 7 5 amod 7 6 advmod 11 8 nsubj 11 9 aux 11 10 dep 2 11 dobj 11 12 det 15 14 2 11 2 7 2 1 2 3 10 11 10 9 11 12 11 9 Was Sardar Patel ever convicted of a crime? Sardar_Patel was convicted of a crime . Sardar_Patel NNP Sardar_Patel sardar was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 convicted VBN convict convict 0.0769230769230769 of IN of of a DT a a crime NN crime crime 0.03125 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Sardar_Patel)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN convicted) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (NN crime))))) (. .)) IN_of 3 6 nsubjpass 3 1 auxpass 3 2 det 6 5 2 1 2 3 3 6 3 1 Darryl Strawberry recently avoided imprisonment when a judge sentenced him to a drug treatment center for violating his probation. Darryl Strawberry recently avoided imprisonment when a judge sentenced him to a drug treatment center for violating his probation . Darryl_Strawberry NNP Darryl_Strawberri darryl NNP 0 PERSON recently RB recent recently 0.00806451612903226 avoided VBD avoid avoid 0.111111111111111 imprisonment NN imprison imprisonment 0.25 when WRB when when 4.30292598967298E-4 a DT a a judge NN judg judge 0.0416666666666667 sentenced VBD sentenc sentence him PRP him he to TO to to a DT a a drug NN drug drug 0.0555555555555556 treatment NN treatment treatment 0.00819672131147541 center NN center center 0.0053475935828877 for IN for for violating VBG violat violate 0.25 his PRP$ hi his probation NN probat probation 0.166666666666667 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Darryl_Strawberry)) (ADVP (RB recently)) (VP (VBD avoided) (NP (NN imprisonment)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (DT a) (NN judge)) (VP (VBD sentenced) (NP (PRP him)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT a) (NN drug) (NN treatment) (NN center))) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG violating) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN probation))))))))) (. .)) IN_to 8 14 IN_for 8 16 nsubj 3 1 advmod 3 2 dobj 3 4 advmod 8 5 det 7 6 nsubj 8 7 dep 3 8 dobj 8 9 det 14 11 nn 14 12 nn 14 13 poss 18 17 dobj 16 18 3 4 3 2 3 8 3 1 8 9 8 14 8 16 8 5 8 7 16 18 16 7 Was Darryl Strawberry ever in prison? Darryl_Strawberry was in prison . Darryl_Strawberry NNP Darryl_Strawberri darryl was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 in IN in in prison NN prison prison 0.024390243902439 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Darryl_Strawberry)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN prison)))) (. .)) IN_in 2 4 nsubj 2 1 2 1 2 4 Darryl Strawberry recently avoided imprisonment when a judge sentenced him to a drug treatment center for violating his probation. Darryl Strawberry recently avoided imprisonment when a judge sentenced him to a drug treatment center for violating his probation . Darryl_Strawberry NNP Darryl_Strawberri darryl NNP 0 PERSON recently RB recent recently 0.00806451612903226 avoided VBD avoid avoid 0.111111111111111 imprisonment NN imprison imprisonment 0.25 when WRB when when 4.30292598967298E-4 a DT a a judge NN judg judge 0.0416666666666667 sentenced VBD sentenc sentence him PRP him he to TO to to a DT a a drug NN drug drug 0.0555555555555556 treatment NN treatment treatment 0.00819672131147541 center NN center center 0.0053475935828877 for IN for for violating VBG violat violate 0.25 his PRP$ hi his probation NN probat probation 0.166666666666667 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Darryl_Strawberry)) (ADVP (RB recently)) (VP (VBD avoided) (NP (NN imprisonment)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (DT a) (NN judge)) (VP (VBD sentenced) (NP (PRP him)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT a) (NN drug) (NN treatment) (NN center))) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG violating) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN probation))))))))) (. .)) IN_to 8 14 IN_for 8 16 nsubj 3 1 advmod 3 2 dobj 3 4 advmod 8 5 det 7 6 nsubj 8 7 dep 3 8 dobj 8 9 det 14 11 nn 14 12 nn 14 13 poss 18 17 dobj 16 18 3 1 3 8 3 4 3 2 8 16 8 9 8 5 8 14 8 7 16 18 16 7 Was Darryl imprisoned for violating his probation? Darryl imprisoned for was violating his probation . Darryl NNP Darryl Darryl NNP 0 PERSON imprisoned VBN imprison imprison 0.25 for IN for for was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 violating VBG violat violate 0.25 his PRP$ hi his probation NN probat probation 0.166666666666667 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Darryl)) (VP (VBN imprisoned) (PP (IN for)))) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG violating) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN probation)))) (. .)) nsubj 5 1 partmod 1 2 dep 2 3 aux 5 4 poss 7 6 dobj 5 7 2 3 2 1 4 5 4 1 5 7 5 1 Three patients declined further surgery. Three patients declined further surgery . Three CD Three three patients NNS patient patient 0.0277777777777778 declined VBD declin decline 0.0714285714285714 further JJ further further 0.00869565217391304 surgery NN surgeri surgery 0.25 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (CD Three) (NNS patients)) (VP (VBD declined) (NP (JJ further) (NN surgery))) (. .)) num 2 1 nsubj 3 2 amod 5 4 dobj 3 5 3 2 3 5 Did the patients have any surgeries? The patients did have some surgeries . The DT The the patients NNS patient patient 0.0277777777777778 did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 have VB have have 5.98802395209581E-4 some DT some some surgeries NNS surgeri surgery . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS patients)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT some) (NNS surgeries)))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 det 6 5 dobj 4 6 3 4 3 2 4 6 4 2 Foodstuffs are being blocked from entry into Iraq. Foodstuffs are being blocked from entry into Iraq . Foodstuffs NNS Foodstuff foodstuffs 0.5 are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 being VBG be be 0.00145772594752187 blocked VBN block block 0.125 from IN from from entry NN entri entry 0.032258064516129 into IN into into Iraq NNP Iraq Iraq NNP 0 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Foodstuffs)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBN blocked) (PP (IN from) (NP (NN entry))) (PP (IN into) (NP (NNP Iraq)))))) (. .)) IN_from 4 6 IN_into 4 8 nsubjpass 4 1 aux 4 2 auxpass 4 3 2 1 2 4 3 1 3 4 4 6 4 8 4 1 Are foodstuffs getting into Iraq? Foodstuffs are getting into Iraq . Foodstuffs NNS Foodstuff foodstuffs 0.5 are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 getting VBG get get 0.00609756097560976 into IN into into Iraq NNP Iraq Iraq NNP 0 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Foodstuffs)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG getting) (PP (IN into) (NP (NNP Iraq))))) (. .)) IN_into 3 5 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 2 3 2 1 3 5 3 1 The new space allowed Compaq to increase the manufacturing capacity of its plant in Erskine, Scotland. The new space allowed Compaq to increase the manufacturing capacity of its plant in Erskine , Scotland . The DT The the new JJ new new 9.31098696461825E-4 space NN space space 0.00584795321637427 allowed VBD allow allow 0.0384615384615385 Compaq NNP Compaq Compaq NNP 0 ORGANIZATION to TO to to increase VB increas increase 0.0144927536231884 the DT the the manufacturing VBG manufactur manufacture 0.1 capacity NN capac capacity 0.0119047619047619 of IN of of its PRP$ it its plant NN plant plant 0.00840336134453781 in IN in in Erskine NNP Erskine Erskine NNP 1 LOCATION , , , , Scotland NNP Scotland Scotland NNP 2 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ new) (NN space)) (VP (VBD allowed) (S (NP (NNP Compaq)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB increase) (NP (NP (DT the) (VBG manufacturing) (NN capacity)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN plant)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Erskine) (, ,) (NNP Scotland)))))))))) (. .)) IN_of 10 13 IN_in 13 17 det 3 1 amod 3 2 nsubj 4 3 xsubj 7 3 nsubj 7 5 aux 7 6 purpcl 4 7 xcomp 4 7 det 10 8 amod 10 9 dobj 7 10 poss 13 12 dep 17 15 4 7 4 3 7 5 7 10 9 10 Did Compaq increase its manufacturing capacity in the Erskine plant? Compaq did increase its manufacturing capacity in the Erskine plant . Compaq NNP Compaq Compaq NNP 0 ORGANIZATION did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 increase VB increas increase 0.0144927536231884 its PRP$ it its manufacturing VBG manufactur manufacture 0.1 capacity NN capac capacity 0.0119047619047619 in IN in in the DT the the Erskine NNP Erskine Erskine NNP 1 LOCATION plant NN plant plant 0.00840336134453781 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Compaq)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB increase) (NP (PRP$ its) (VBG manufacturing) (NN capacity)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Erskine) (NN plant))))) (. .)) IN_in 3 10 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 poss 6 4 amod 6 5 dobj 3 6 det 10 8 nn 10 9 2 3 2 1 3 6 3 10 3 1 5 6 Holders of more than a majority of the stock of the company have approved the transaction by written consent. Holders of more than a majority of the stock of the company have approved the transaction by written consent . Holders NNS Holder holders 0.142857142857143 of IN of of more_than IN more_than more a DT a a majority NN major majority 0.0175438596491228 of IN of of the DT the the stock NN stock stock 0.00735294117647059 of IN of of the DT the the company NN compani company 0.00364963503649635 have VBP have have 4.44839857651246E-4 approved VBN approv approve 0.0476190476190476 the DT the the transaction NN transact transaction 0.2 by IN by by written VBN written write 0.00689655172413793 consent NN consent consent 0.0666666666666667 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Holders)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (QP (IN more_than) (DT a)) (NN majority)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN stock)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN company)))))))) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN approved) (NP (DT the) (NN transaction)) (PP (IN by) (NP (VBN written) (NN consent))))) (. .)) IN_of 1 5 IN_of 5 8 IN_of 8 11 IN_by 13 18 nsubj 13 1 num 5 3 dep 3 4 det 8 7 det 11 10 aux 13 12 det 15 14 dobj 13 15 amod 18 17 12 1 12 13 13 1 13 15 17 18 Has the transaction taken place? The transaction has taken place . The DT The the transaction NN transact transaction 0.2 has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 taken_place VBN taken_plac taken . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN transaction)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN taken_place))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 3 2 3 4 4 2 The transaction has been approved by Kyle's board but requires the approval of the company's shareholders. The transaction has been approved by Kyle 's board but requires the approval of the company 's shareholders . The DT The the transaction NN transact transaction 0.2 has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 been VBN been be 1.0 approved VBN approv approve 0.0476190476190476 by IN by by Kyle NNP Kyle Kyle NNP 0 ORGANIZATION 's POS 's 's board NN board board 0.00584795321637427 but CC but but 7.30460189919649E-4 requires VBZ requir require 0.0185185185185185 the DT the the approval NN approv approval 0.0196078431372549 of IN of of the DT the the company NN compani company 0.00364963503649635 's POS 's 's shareholders NNS sharehold shareholder 0.333333333333333 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN transaction)) (VP (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN approved) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NNP Kyle) (POS 's)) (NN board)))))) (CC but) (VP (VBZ requires) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN approval)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN company) (POS 's)) (NNS shareholders)))))) (. .)) agent 5 9 IN_of 13 18 det 2 1 nsubjpass 5 2 aux 5 3 auxpass 5 4 poss 9 7 but 5 11 det 13 12 dobj 11 13 det 16 15 poss 18 16 3 5 3 2 4 2 4 5 5 9 5 2 11 2 11 13 Has the transaction taken place? The transaction has taken place . The DT The the transaction NN transact transaction 0.2 has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 taken_place VBN taken_plac taken . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN transaction)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN taken_place))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 3 4 3 2 4 2 The company's board authorized the purchase of an additional one million shares. The company 's board authorized the purchase of an additional one million shares . The DT The the company NN compani company 0.00364963503649635 's POS 's 's board NN board board 0.00584795321637427 authorized VBD author authorize 0.2 the DT the the purchase NN purchas purchase 0.0333333333333333 of IN of of an DT an an additional JJ addit additional 0.00862068965517241 one CD on one million CD million million shares NNS share share 0.0227272727272727 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN company) (POS 's)) (NN board)) (VP (VBD authorized) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN purchase)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT an) (JJ additional) (QP (CD one) (CD million)) (NNS shares))))) (. .)) IN_of 7 13 det 2 1 poss 4 2 nsubj 5 4 det 7 6 dobj 5 7 det 13 9 amod 13 10 num 13 11 number 11 12 5 4 5 7 Has the company purchased additional shares? The company has purchased additional shares . The DT The the company NN compani company 0.00364963503649635 has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 purchased VBN purchas purchase 0.0666666666666667 additional JJ addit additional 0.00862068965517241 shares NNS share share 0.0227272727272727 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN company)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN purchased) (NP (JJ additional) (NNS shares)))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 amod 6 5 dobj 4 6 3 2 3 4 4 2 4 6 The purchase was subsequently rejected by regulators. The purchase was subsequently rejected by regulators . The DT The the purchase NN purchas purchase 0.0333333333333333 was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 subsequently RB subsequ subsequently 0.0909090909090909 rejected VBN reject reject 0.0555555555555556 by IN by by regulators NNS regul regulator . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN purchase)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB subsequently)) (VP (VBN rejected) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNS regulators))))) (. .)) agent 5 7 det 2 1 nsubjpass 5 2 auxpass 5 3 advmod 5 4 3 2 3 4 3 5 5 2 5 4 5 7 Did the purchase take place? The purchase did take place . The DT The the purchase NN purchas purchase 0.0333333333333333 did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 take_place VB take_plac take . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN purchase)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB take_place))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 3 4 3 2 4 2 Analysts were predicting 1990 BellSouth earnings in the range of $3.90 a share. Analysts were predicting 1990 BellSouth earnings in the range of $ 3.90 a share . Analysts NNS Analyst analysts 0.166666666666667 were VBD were be predicting VBG predict predict 0.142857142857143 1990 CD 1990 1990 BellSouth NNP BellSouth BellSouth NNP 0 ORGANIZATION earnings NNS earn earnings 0.0454545454545455 in IN in in the DT the the range NN rang range 0.00549450549450549 of IN of of $ $ $ $ $ 1 MONEY $3.9 3.90 CD 3.90 3.90 CD 2 MONEY $3.9 a DT a a share NN share share 0.0163934426229508 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Analysts)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBG predicting) (NP (CD 1990) (NNP BellSouth) (NNS earnings)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN range)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP ($ $) (CD 3.90)) (NP (DT a) (NN share)))))))) (. .)) IN_in 3 9 IN_of 9 11 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 num 6 4 nn 6 5 dobj 3 6 det 9 8 num 11 12 det 14 13 dep 11 14 2 3 2 1 3 6 3 1 Has BellSouth experienced earnings in 1990? BellSouth has experienced earnings in 1990 . BellSouth NNP BellSouth BellSouth NNP 0 ORGANIZATION has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 experienced VBN experienc experience 0.0416666666666667 earnings NNS earn earnings 0.0454545454545455 in IN in in 1990 CD 1990 1990 CD 1 DATE 01/01/1990 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP BellSouth)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN experienced) (NP (NP (NNS earnings)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1990)))))) (. .)) IN_in 4 6 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 dobj 3 4 2 3 2 1 3 4 3 1 Milton Roy disclosed in May that it was approached for a possible acquisition by Thermo Electron. Milton Roy disclosed in May that it was approached for a possible acquisition by Thermo Electron . Milton_Roy NNP Milton_Roi milton NNP 0 PERSON disclosed VBD disclos disclose 0.142857142857143 in IN in in May NNP Mai May NNP 1 DATE 05/01/1000 that IN that that it PRP it it was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 approached VBN approach approach 0.0769230769230769 for IN for for a DT a a possible JJ possibl possible 0.00271739130434783 acquisition NN acquisit acquisition 0.0588235294117647 by IN by by Thermo_Electron NNP Thermo_Electron thermo NNP 2 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Milton_Roy)) (VP (VBD disclosed) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP May))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN approached) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ possible) (NN acquisition))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP Thermo_Electron)))))))) (. .)) IN_in 2 4 IN_for 8 12 agent 8 14 nsubj 2 1 complm 8 5 nsubjpass 8 6 auxpass 8 7 ccomp 2 8 det 12 10 amod 12 11 2 1 2 8 2 4 7 6 7 8 8 14 8 6 8 12 Was Milton Roy approached by Thermo Electron? Milton_Roy approached was by Thermo_Electron . Milton_Roy RB Milton_Roi milton approached VBN approach approach 0.0769230769230769 was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 by IN by by Thermo_Electron NNP Thermo_Electron thermo . . . . (ROOT (S (S (VP (ADVP (RB Milton_Roy)) (VBN approached))) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP Thermo_Electron)))) (. .)) IN_by 3 5 advmod 2 1 dep 3 2 2 1 3 2 3 5 Milton Roy disclosed in May that it was approached for a possible acquisition by Thermo Electron. Milton Roy disclosed in May that it was approached for a possible acquisition by Thermo Electron . Milton_Roy NNP Milton_Roi milton NNP 0 PERSON disclosed VBD disclos disclose 0.142857142857143 in IN in in May NNP Mai May NNP 1 DATE 05/01/1000 that IN that that it PRP it it was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 approached VBN approach approach 0.0769230769230769 for IN for for a DT a a possible JJ possibl possible 0.00271739130434783 acquisition NN acquisit acquisition 0.0588235294117647 by IN by by Thermo_Electron NNP Thermo_Electron thermo NNP 2 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Milton_Roy)) (VP (VBD disclosed) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP May))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN approached) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ possible) (NN acquisition))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP Thermo_Electron)))))))) (. .)) IN_in 2 4 IN_for 8 12 agent 8 14 nsubj 2 1 complm 8 5 nsubjpass 8 6 auxpass 8 7 ccomp 2 8 det 12 10 amod 12 11 2 1 2 8 2 4 7 6 7 8 8 12 8 14 8 6 Has Milton Roy been acquired by Thermo Electron? Milton_Roy has been acquired by Thermo_Electron . Milton_Roy NNP Milton_Roi milton has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 been VBN been be 1.0 acquired VBN acquir acquire 0.0588235294117647 by IN by by Thermo_Electron NNP Thermo_Electron thermo . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Milton_Roy)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN acquired) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP Thermo_Electron)))))) (. .)) agent 4 6 nsubjpass 4 1 aux 4 2 auxpass 4 3 2 1 2 4 3 1 3 4 4 1 4 6 Analysts noted that over the past 20 years, Mr. Fournier has built his company through astute stock-market activity. Analysts noted that over the past 20 years , Mr. Fournier has built his company through astute stock-market activity . Analysts NNS Analyst analysts 0.166666666666667 noted VBD note note 0.0357142857142857 that IN that that over IN over over the DT the the past JJ past past 0.00862068965517241 JJ 0 DATE 01/20/1000 20 CD 20 20 CD 1 DATE 01/20/1000 years NNS year year 0.0010515247108307 NNS 2 DATE 01/20/1000 , , , , Mr._Fournier NNP Mr._Fournier mr. NNP 3 PERSON has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 built VBN built build 0.0111111111111111 his PRP$ hi his company NN compani company 0.00364963503649635 through IN through through astute JJ astut astute 1.0 stock-market NN stock-market stock-market activity NN activ activity 0.0087719298245614 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Analysts)) (VP (VBD noted) (SBAR (IN that) (S (PP (IN over) (NP (DT the) (JJ past) (CD 20) (NNS years))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Mr._Fournier)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN built) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN company)) (PP (IN through) (NP (JJ astute) (NN stock-market) (NN activity)))))))) (. .)) IN_over 12 8 IN_through 12 18 nsubj 2 1 complm 12 3 det 8 5 amod 8 6 num 8 7 nsubj 12 10 aux 12 11 ccomp 2 12 poss 14 13 dobj 12 14 amod 18 16 nn 18 17 2 1 2 12 11 8 11 10 11 12 12 8 12 10 12 18 12 14 Has Mr. Fournier built his company through astute stock-market activity? Mr._Fournier has built his company through astute stock-market activity . Mr._Fournier NNP Mr._Fournier mr. has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 built VBN built build 0.0111111111111111 his PRP$ hi his company NN compani company 0.00364963503649635 through IN through through astute JJ astut astute 1.0 stock-market NN stock-market stock-market activity NN activ activity 0.0087719298245614 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Mr._Fournier)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN built) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN company)) (PP (IN through) (NP (JJ astute) (NN stock-market) (NN activity))))) (. .)) IN_through 3 9 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 poss 5 4 dobj 3 5 amod 9 7 nn 9 8 2 1 2 3 3 9 3 1 3 5 I was pleased that Ms. Currie's lawyers stated unambiguously this morning that she's not aware of any unethical conduct. I was pleased that Ms. Currie 's lawyers stated unambiguously this morning that she 's not aware of any unethical conduct . I PRP I I was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 pleased JJ pleas pleased 0.05 that IN that that Ms._Currie NNP Ms._Curri ms. NNP 0 PERSON 's POS 's 's lawyers NNS lawyer lawyer 0.0434782608695652 stated VBD state state 0.0285714285714286 unambiguously RB unambigu unambiguously 0.5 this DT thi this morning NN morn morning 0.004739336492891 that IN that that she PRP she she 's VBZ 's be not RB not not 2.17108119843682E-4 aware JJ awar aware 0.0119047619047619 of IN of of any DT ani any unethical JJ uneth unethical conduct NN conduct conduct 0.0285714285714286 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ pleased)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (NNP Ms._Currie) (POS 's)) (NNS lawyers)) (VP (VBD stated) (NP-TMP (RB unambiguously) (DT this) (NN morning)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBZ 's) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ aware) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT any) (JJ unethical) (NN conduct))))))))))) (. .)) IN_of 16 20 nsubj 3 1 cop 3 2 complm 8 4 poss 7 5 nsubj 8 7 ccomp 3 8 det 11 9 det 11 10 tmod 8 11 complm 16 12 nsubj 16 13 cop 16 14 neg 16 15 ccomp 8 16 det 20 18 amod 20 19 2 8 2 3 2 1 8 7 8 16 14 13 14 16 Is Ms. Currie aware of any unethical conduct on her part? Ms._Currie is aware of some unethical conduct on her part . Ms._Currie NNP Ms._Curri ms. NNP 0 PERSON is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 aware JJ awar aware 0.0119047619047619 of IN of of some DT some some unethical JJ uneth unethical conduct NN conduct conduct 0.0285714285714286 on IN on on her PRP$ her she part NN part part 0.00198019801980198 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Ms._Currie)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ aware) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT some) (JJ unethical) (NN conduct)) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP$ her) (NN part))))))) (. .)) IN_of 3 7 IN_on 7 10 nsubj 3 1 cop 3 2 det 7 5 amod 7 6 poss 10 9 2 1 2 3 I was pleased that Ms. Currie's lawyers stated unambiguously this morning that she's not aware of any unethical conduct. I was pleased that Ms. Currie 's lawyers stated unambiguously this morning that she 's not aware of any unethical conduct . I PRP I I was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 pleased JJ pleas pleased 0.05 that IN that that Ms._Currie NNP Ms._Curri ms. NNP 0 PERSON 's POS 's 's lawyers NNS lawyer lawyer 0.0434782608695652 stated VBD state state 0.0285714285714286 unambiguously RB unambigu unambiguously 0.5 this DT thi this morning NN morn morning 0.004739336492891 that IN that that she PRP she she 's VBZ 's be not RB not not 2.17108119843682E-4 aware JJ awar aware 0.0119047619047619 of IN of of any DT ani any unethical JJ uneth unethical conduct NN conduct conduct 0.0285714285714286 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ pleased)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (NNP Ms._Currie) (POS 's)) (NNS lawyers)) (VP (VBD stated) (NP-TMP (RB unambiguously) (DT this) (NN morning)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBZ 's) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ aware) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT any) (JJ unethical) (NN conduct))))))))))) (. .)) IN_of 16 20 nsubj 3 1 cop 3 2 complm 8 4 poss 7 5 nsubj 8 7 ccomp 3 8 det 11 9 det 11 10 tmod 8 11 complm 16 12 nsubj 16 13 cop 16 14 neg 16 15 ccomp 8 16 det 20 18 amod 20 19 2 8 2 1 2 3 8 7 8 16 14 13 14 16 Have Ms. Currie’s lawyers stated she’s not aware of any unethical conduct? Ms._Currie 's lawyers have stated she 's not aware of some unethical conduct . Ms._Currie NNP Ms._Curri ms. NNP 0 PERSON 's POS 's 's lawyers NNS lawyer lawyer 0.0434782608695652 have VBP have have 4.44839857651246E-4 stated VBN state state 0.0204081632653061 she PRP she she 's VBZ 's be not RB not not 2.17108119843682E-4 aware JJ awar aware 0.0119047619047619 of IN of of some DT some some unethical JJ uneth unethical conduct NN conduct conduct 0.0285714285714286 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Ms._Currie) (POS 's)) (NNS lawyers)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN stated) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBZ 's) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ aware) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT some) (JJ unethical) (NN conduct))))))))) (. .)) IN_of 9 13 poss 3 1 nsubj 5 3 aux 5 4 nsubj 9 6 cop 9 7 neg 9 8 ccomp 5 9 det 13 11 amod 13 12 4 3 4 5 5 9 5 3 7 6 7 9 President Clinton and Blair will stand together on arresting the terrorists suspected of blowing up Pan Am flight 103 over Scotland. President Clinton and Blair will stand together on arresting the terrorists suspected of blowing up Pan Am flight 103 over Scotland . President_Clinton NNP President_Clinton president and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 Blair NNP Blair Blair NNP 0 PERSON will MD will will 0.0294117647058824 stand VB stand stand 0.0163934426229508 together RB togeth together 0.00384615384615385 on IN on on arresting VBG arrest arrest 0.2 the DT the the terrorists NNS terrorist terrorist 1.0 suspected VBN suspect suspect 0.125 of IN of of blowing_up VBG blowing_up blowing Pan_Am NNP Pan_Am pan NNP 1 ORGANIZATION flight NN flight flight 0.0222222222222222 103 NNP 103 103 over IN over over Scotland NNP Scotland Scotland NNP 2 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP President_Clinton) (CC and) (NNP Blair)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB stand) (ADVP (RB together)) (PP (IN on) (S (VP (VBG arresting) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS terrorists)) (VP (VBN suspected) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG blowing_up) (NP (NP (NNP Pan_Am) (NN flight) (NNP 103)) (PP (IN over) (NP (NNP Scotland)))))))))))))) (. .)) IN_on 5 8 IN_of 11 13 IN_over 16 18 nsubj 5 1 and 1 3 aux 5 4 advmod 5 6 det 10 9 dobj 8 10 partmod 10 11 nn 16 14 nn 16 15 dobj 13 16 5 6 5 8 5 4 5 1 8 10 8 1 11 13 11 10 13 16 13 10 Has there been an explosion of a Pan Am flight over Scotland? There has been an explosion of a Pan Am flight over Scotland . There EX There there 4.86381322957198E-4 has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 been VBN been be 1.0 an DT an an explosion NN explos explosion 0.0625 of IN of of a DT a a Pan NNP Pan Pan Am NNP Am Am flight NN flight flight 0.0222222222222222 over IN over over Scotland NNP Scotland Scotland NNP 0 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN explosion)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (NNP Pan) (NNP Am) (NN flight)))) (PP (IN over) (NP (NNP Scotland))))) (. .)) IN_of 5 10 IN_over 3 12 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 det 5 4 dobj 3 5 det 10 7 nn 10 8 nn 10 9 2 1 2 3 3 5 3 12 The accord helps RJR pay off debt. The accord helps RJR pay off debt . The DT The the accord NN accord accord 0.142857142857143 helps VBZ help help 0.0344827586206897 RJR NNP RJR RJR NNP 0 ORGANIZATION pay_off VB pay_off pay debt NN debt debt 0.0714285714285714 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN accord)) (VP (VBZ helps) (S (NP (NNP RJR)) (VP (VB pay_off) (NP (NN debt))))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 3 2 nsubj 5 4 ccomp 3 5 dobj 5 6 3 5 3 2 5 6 5 4 Does RJR have any debt? RJR does have some debt . RJR NNP RJR RJR NNP 0 ORGANIZATION does VBZ doe do 0.00215982721382289 have VB have have 5.98802395209581E-4 some DT some some debt NN debt debt 0.0714285714285714 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP RJR)) (VP (VBZ does) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT some) (NN debt)))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 det 5 4 dobj 3 5 2 1 2 3 3 5 3 1 48 Kuwaiti jet fighters managed to escape the Iraqi invasion. 48 Kuwaiti jet fighters managed to escape the Iraqi invasion . 48 CD 48 48 Kuwaiti NNP Kuwaiti Kuwaiti NNP 0 ORGANIZATION jet NN jet jet 0.04 fighters NNS fighter fighter 0.0666666666666667 managed VBD manag manage 0.0434782608695652 to TO to to escape VB escap escape 0.025 the DT the the Iraqi NNP Iraqi Iraqi NNP 1 LOCATION invasion NN invas invasion 0.0588235294117647 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (CD 48) (NNP Kuwaiti) (NN jet) (NNS fighters)) (VP (VBD managed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB escape) (NP (DT the) (NNP Iraqi) (NN invasion)))))) (. .)) num 4 1 nn 4 2 nn 4 3 nsubj 5 4 xsubj 7 4 aux 7 6 purpcl 5 7 xcomp 5 7 det 10 8 nn 10 9 dobj 7 10 5 4 5 7 7 4 7 10 Did any Kuwaiti jet fighters escape the Iraqi invasion? Some Kuwaiti jet did fighters escape the Iraqi invasion . Some DT Some some Kuwaiti NNP Kuwaiti Kuwaiti NNP 0 PERSON jet NN jet jet 0.04 did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 fighters NNS fighter fighter 0.0666666666666667 escape VB escap escape 0.025 the DT the the Iraqi NNP Iraqi Iraqi NNP 1 LOCATION invasion NN invas invasion 0.0588235294117647 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT Some) (NNP Kuwaiti) (NN jet)) (VP (VBD did) (S (NP (NNS fighters)) (VP (VB escape) (NP (DT the) (NNP Iraqi) (NN invasion))))) (. .)) det 3 1 nn 3 2 nsubj 4 3 nsubj 6 5 ccomp 4 6 det 9 7 nn 9 8 dobj 6 9 4 6 4 3 6 9 6 5 It appears that allied troops haven't yet fully engaged Iraq's Republican Guard. It appears that allied troops have n't yet fully engaged Iraq 's Republican Guard . It PRP It it appears VBZ appear appear 0.0120481927710843 that IN that that allied JJ alli allied 0.0909090909090909 troops NNS troop troops 0.0192307692307692 have VBP have have 4.44839857651246E-4 n't RB n't not yet RB yet yet 0.00305810397553517 fully RB fulli fully 0.0126582278481013 engaged VBN engag engage 0.0303030303030303 Iraq NNP Iraq Iraq NNP 0 LOCATION 's POS 's 's Republican_Guard NN Republican_Guard republican . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ appears) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (JJ allied) (NNS troops)) (VP (VBP have) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB yet)) (VP (ADVP (RB fully)) (VBN engaged) (NP (NP (NNP Iraq) (POS 's)) (NN Republican_Guard))))))) (. .)) nsubj 2 1 complm 10 3 amod 5 4 nsubj 10 5 aux 10 6 neg 10 7 advmod 10 8 advmod 10 9 ccomp 2 10 poss 13 11 dobj 10 13 2 10 6 8 6 7 6 10 6 5 10 8 10 9 10 7 10 13 10 5 Have allied troops engaged Iraq’s Republican Guard? Allied troops have engaged Iraq 's Republican Guard . Allied NNP Alli Allied troops NNS troop troops 0.0192307692307692 have VBP have have 4.44839857651246E-4 engaged VBN engag engage 0.0303030303030303 Iraq NNP Iraq Iraq NNP 0 LOCATION 's POS 's 's Republican_Guard NN Republican_Guard republican . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Allied) (NNS troops)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN engaged) (NP (NP (NNP Iraq) (POS 's)) (NN Republican_Guard)))) (. .)) nn 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 poss 7 5 dobj 4 7 3 4 3 2 4 2 4 7 British police officers concluded Howes had probably been killed soon after being captured. British police officers concluded Howes had probably been killed soon after being captured . British NNP British British NNP 0 LOCATION police_officers NNS police_offic police concluded VBD conclud conclude 0.0434782608695652 Howes NNP How Howes had VBD had have 2.02634245187437E-4 probably RB probabl probably 0.00389105058365759 been VBN been be 1.0 killed VBN kill kill 0.0263157894736842 soon RB soon soon 0.0050251256281407 after IN after after being VBG be be 0.00145772594752187 captured VBN captur capture 0.0588235294117647 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP British) (NNS police_officers)) (VP (VBD concluded) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Howes)) (VP (VBD had) (ADVP (RB probably)) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN killed) (ADVP (RB soon)) (PP (IN after) (S (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBN captured))))))))))) (. .)) IN_after 8 12 nn 2 1 nsubj 3 2 nsubjpass 8 4 aux 8 5 advmod 8 6 auxpass 8 7 ccomp 3 8 advmod 8 9 auxpass 12 11 3 2 3 8 5 8 5 6 5 4 7 8 7 6 7 4 8 6 8 4 8 10 8 9 11 12 11 4 12 4 Did Howes die? Howes did die . Howes NNP How Howes NNP 0 PERSON did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 die VB die die 0.0208333333333333 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Howes)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB die))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 2 3 2 1 3 1 British police officers concluded Howes had probably been killed soon after being captured. British police officers concluded Howes had probably been killed soon after being captured . British NNP British British NNP 0 LOCATION police_officers NNS police_offic police concluded VBD conclud conclude 0.0434782608695652 Howes NNP How Howes had VBD had have 2.02634245187437E-4 probably RB probabl probably 0.00389105058365759 been VBN been be 1.0 killed VBN kill kill 0.0263157894736842 soon RB soon soon 0.0050251256281407 after IN after after being VBG be be 0.00145772594752187 captured VBN captur capture 0.0588235294117647 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP British) (NNS police_officers)) (VP (VBD concluded) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Howes)) (VP (VBD had) (ADVP (RB probably)) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN killed) (ADVP (RB soon)) (PP (IN after) (S (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBN captured))))))))))) (. .)) IN_after 8 12 nn 2 1 nsubj 3 2 nsubjpass 8 4 aux 8 5 advmod 8 6 auxpass 8 7 ccomp 3 8 advmod 8 9 auxpass 12 11 3 2 3 8 5 4 5 6 5 8 7 8 7 4 7 6 8 4 8 6 8 10 8 9 11 12 11 4 12 4 Was Howes killed soon after being captured? Howes killed soon after was being captured . Howes NNS How howes killed VBD kill kill 0.027027027027027 soon RB soon soon 0.0050251256281407 after IN after after was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 being VBG be be 0.00145772594752187 captured VBN captur capture 0.0588235294117647 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Howes)) (VP (VBD killed) (SBAR (RB soon) (IN after) (S (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBN captured))))))) (. .)) nsubj 2 1 dep 7 3 dep 7 4 aux 7 5 auxpass 7 6 ccomp 2 7 2 7 2 1 5 7 6 7 7 1 The police allowed the crowd to demonstrate on nearby streets. The police allowed the crowd to demonstrate on nearby streets . The DT The the police NN polic police 0.0105263157894737 allowed VBD allow allow 0.0384615384615385 the DT the the crowd NN crowd crowd 0.0208333333333333 to TO to to demonstrate VB demonstr demonstrate 0.0357142857142857 on IN on on nearby JJ nearbi nearby 0.0434782608695652 streets NNS street street 0.0169491525423729 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN police)) (VP (VBD allowed) (NP (DT the) (NN crowd) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB demonstrate) (PP (IN on) (NP (JJ nearby) (NNS streets)))))))) (. .)) IN_on 7 10 det 2 1 nsubj 3 2 det 5 4 dobj 3 5 aux 7 6 infmod 5 7 amod 10 9 3 5 3 2 7 2 7 10 Did the crowd demonstrate on nearby streets? The crowd did demonstrate on nearby streets . The DT The the crowd NN crowd crowd 0.0208333333333333 did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 demonstrate VB demonstr demonstrate 0.0357142857142857 on IN on on nearby JJ nearbi nearby 0.0434782608695652 streets NNS street street 0.0169491525423729 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN crowd)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB demonstrate) (PP (IN on) (NP (JJ nearby) (NNS streets))))) (. .)) IN_on 4 7 det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 amod 7 6 3 4 3 2 4 7 4 2 In Pakistan, the Taliban have forbidden women to work. In Pakistan , the Taliban have forbidden women to work . In IN In in Pakistan NNP Pakistan Pakistan NNP 0 LOCATION , , , , the DT the the Taliban NNP Taliban Taliban NNP 1 ORGANIZATION have VBP have have 4.44839857651246E-4 forbidden VBN forbidden forbid 0.2 women NNS women woman 0.00523560209424084 to TO to to work VB work work 0.00757575757575758 . . . . (ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NNP Pakistan))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP Taliban)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN forbidden) (NP (NNS women)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB work)))))) (. .)) IN_in 7 2 det 5 4 nsubj 7 5 aux 7 6 dobj 7 8 aux 10 9 purpcl 7 10 6 2 6 7 6 5 7 10 7 2 7 8 7 5 10 5 Do the Taliban want women to work in Pakistan? The Taliban do want women to work in Pakistan . The DT The the Taliban NNP Taliban Taliban do VBP do do 0.00170068027210884 want VB want want 0.0099009900990099 women NNS women woman 0.00523560209424084 to TO to to work VB work work 0.00757575757575758 in IN in in Pakistan NNP Pakistan Pakistan NNP 0 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Taliban)) (VP (VBP do) (VP (VB want) (S (NP (NNS women)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB work) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Pakistan)))))))) (. .)) IN_in 7 9 det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 xsubj 7 2 aux 4 3 nsubj 7 5 aux 7 6 purpcl 4 7 xcomp 4 7 3 2 3 4 4 7 4 2 7 9 7 5 In Pakistan, the Taliban have forbidden women to work. In Pakistan , the Taliban have forbidden women to work . In IN In in Pakistan NNP Pakistan Pakistan NNP 0 LOCATION , , , , the DT the the Taliban NNP Taliban Taliban NNP 1 ORGANIZATION have VBP have have 4.44839857651246E-4 forbidden VBN forbidden forbid 0.2 women NNS women woman 0.00523560209424084 to TO to to work VB work work 0.00757575757575758 . . . . (ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NNP Pakistan))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP Taliban)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN forbidden) (NP (NNS women)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB work)))))) (. .)) IN_in 7 2 det 5 4 nsubj 7 5 aux 7 6 dobj 7 8 aux 10 9 purpcl 7 10 6 7 6 2 6 5 7 10 7 2 7 8 7 5 10 5 Do women work in Pakistan? Women do work in Pakistan . Women NNP Women Women do VBP do do 0.00170068027210884 work VB work work 0.00757575757575758 in IN in in Pakistan NNP Pakistan Pakistan NNP 0 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Women)) (VP (VBP do) (NP (NP (VB work)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Pakistan))))) (. .)) IN_in 3 5 nsubj 2 1 dobj 2 3 2 1 2 3 3 5 The Administration is trying to decide whether Saddam Hussein has WMD. The Administration is trying to decide whether Saddam Hussein has WMD . The DT The the Administration NNP Administr Administration is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 trying VBG try try 0.00613496932515337 to TO to to decide VB decid decide 0.0344827586206897 whether IN whether whether Saddam_Hussein NNP Saddam_Hussein saddam NNP 0 PERSON has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 WMD NNP WMD WMD . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Administration)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG trying) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB decide) (SBAR (IN whether) (S (NP (NNP Saddam_Hussein)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NNP WMD)))))))))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 xsubj 6 2 aux 4 3 aux 6 5 purpcl 4 6 xcomp 4 6 complm 9 7 nsubj 9 8 ccomp 6 9 dobj 9 10 3 4 3 2 4 2 4 6 6 9 6 2 9 10 9 8 Is the administration deciding whether Saddam Hussein has WMD? The administration is deciding whether Saddam_Hussein has WMD . The DT The the administration NN administr administration 0.00884955752212389 is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 deciding VBG decid decide 0.0833333333333333 whether IN whether whether Saddam_Hussein NNP Saddam_Hussein saddam has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 WMD NNP WMD WMD NNP 0 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN administration)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG deciding) (SBAR (IN whether) (S (NP (NNP Saddam_Hussein)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NNP WMD))))))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 complm 7 5 nsubj 7 6 ccomp 4 7 dobj 7 8 3 4 3 2 4 7 4 2 7 8 7 6 Helicopters are trying to locate people stranded without food. Helicopters are trying to locate people stranded without food . Helicopters NNPS Helicopt Helicopters are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 trying VBG try try 0.00613496932515337 to TO to to locate VB locat locate 0.0625 people NNS peopl people 0.00118203309692671 stranded VBN strand strand 0.25 without IN without without food NN food food 0.00704225352112676 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNPS Helicopters)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG trying) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB locate) (NP (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBN stranded) (PP (IN without) (NP (NN food)))))))))) (. .)) IN_without 7 9 nsubj 3 1 xsubj 5 1 aux 3 2 aux 5 4 purpcl 3 5 xcomp 3 5 dobj 5 6 partmod 6 7 2 1 2 3 3 1 3 5 5 1 5 6 7 6 7 9 Are helicopters locating people stranded without food? Helicopters are locating people stranded without food . Helicopters NNPS Helicopt Helicopters are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 locating VBG locat locate 0.0909090909090909 people NNS peopl people 0.00118203309692671 stranded VBN strand strand 0.25 without IN without without food NN food food 0.00704225352112676 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNPS Helicopters)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG locating) (NP (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBN stranded) (PP (IN without) (NP (NN food))))))) (. .)) IN_without 5 7 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 dobj 3 4 partmod 4 5 2 1 2 3 3 4 3 1 5 7 5 4 MCA agreed to wait on purchasing Cineplex. MCA agreed to wait on purchasing Cineplex . MCA NNP MCA MCA NNP 0 ORGANIZATION agreed VBD agre agree 0.0181818181818182 to TO to to wait VB wait wait 0.0178571428571429 on IN on on purchasing VBG purchas purchase 0.111111111111111 Cineplex NNP Cineplex Cineplex NNP 1 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP MCA)) (VP (VBD agreed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB wait) (PP (IN on) (NP (VBG purchasing) (NNP Cineplex))))))) (. .)) IN_on 4 7 nsubj 2 1 xsubj 4 1 aux 4 3 purpcl 2 4 xcomp 2 4 amod 7 6 2 1 2 4 4 7 4 1 6 7 Is MCA waiting to purchase Cineplex? MCA is waiting to purchase Cineplex . MCA NNP MCA MCA NNP 0 ORGANIZATION is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 waiting VBG wait wait 0.0099009900990099 to TO to to purchase VB purchas purchase 0.0909090909090909 Cineplex NNP Cineplex Cineplex NNP 1 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP MCA)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG waiting) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB purchase) (NP (NNP Cineplex))))))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 xsubj 5 1 aux 3 2 aux 5 4 purpcl 3 5 xcomp 3 5 dobj 5 6 2 1 2 3 3 1 3 5 5 6 5 1 MGM Grand Inc. has agreed to pay $93 million to buy 117 acres of land in Las Vegas. MGM Grand Inc. has agreed to pay $ 93 million to buy 117 acres of land in Las Vegas . MGM_Grand_Inc. NNP MGM_Grand_Inc. mgm NNP 0 ORGANIZATION has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 agreed VBN agre agree 0.04 to TO to to pay VB pai pay 0.00900900900900901 $ $ $ $ $ 1 MONEY $9.3E7 93 CD 93 93 CD 2 MONEY $9.3E7 million CD million million CD 3 MONEY $9.3E7 to TO to to buy VB bui buy 0.0185185185185185 117 CD 117 117 acres NNS acr acre 0.0238095238095238 of IN of of land NN land land 0.00518134715025907 in IN in in Las_Vegas NNP Las_Vega las NNP 4 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP MGM_Grand_Inc.)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN agreed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB pay) (NP (QP ($ $) (CD 93) (CD million))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB buy) (NP (NP (CD 117) (NNS acres)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN land)))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Las_Vegas))))))))))) (. .)) IN_of 12 14 IN_in 10 16 nsubj 3 1 xsubj 5 1 aux 3 2 aux 5 4 purpcl 3 5 xcomp 3 5 dobj 5 6 number 6 7 number 6 8 aux 10 9 purpcl 5 10 num 12 11 dobj 10 12 2 1 2 3 3 1 3 5 5 1 5 6 5 10 10 16 10 1 10 12 Has MGM Grand Inc. paid $93 million to buy 117 acres of land in Las Vegas? MGM_Grand_Inc. has paid $ 93 million to buy 117 acres of land in Las_Vegas . MGM_Grand_Inc. NNP MGM_Grand_Inc. mgm has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 paid VBN paid pay 0.0113636363636364 $ $ $ $ $ 0 MONEY $9.3E7 93 CD 93 93 CD 1 MONEY $9.3E7 million CD million million CD 2 MONEY $9.3E7 to TO to to buy VB bui buy 0.0185185185185185 117 CD 117 117 acres NNS acr acre 0.0238095238095238 of IN of of land NN land land 0.00518134715025907 in IN in in Las_Vegas NNP Las_Vega las . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP MGM_Grand_Inc.)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN paid) (NP (QP ($ $) (CD 93) (CD million))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB buy) (NP (NP (CD 117) (NNS acres)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN land)))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Las_Vegas)))))))) (. .)) IN_of 10 12 IN_in 8 14 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 dobj 3 4 number 4 5 number 4 6 aux 8 7 purpcl 3 8 num 10 9 dobj 8 10 2 3 2 1 3 1 3 8 3 4 8 14 8 1 8 10