Odds changers, or jinglers, attempt to gain favorable odds by dumping large amounts of money on a particular horse, then canceling the bet at the last moment in order to make a second bet at better odds. Do jinglers get better odds? TREC Corpus: NYT19981128.0225 Yes PLANNING medium Yes People usually attempt something only if it has a chance of succeeding or has succeeded in the past medium Unknown medium Jinglers do get better odds . As mentioned, IBM has opted for the mouse stick in the middle of the keyboard instead of the little trackball or the little panel you diddle with your finger. Do IBM keyboards have a mouse stick? TREC Corpus: NYT19991220.0044 Yes When entities "opt for" something, they usually carry it out "Has opted for" occurs far enough in the past that IBM has already had time to implement the choice medium Unknown The existence of the phrase "has opted for" suggests only a preference, not that it has already happened. medium IBM keyboards do have a mouse stick . Born July 5, 1917, Catherine Wood Campbell left her native Atlanta, where she had attended Sacred Heart School and graduated from the Washington Seminary, in the 1930s. Was Catherine Wood Campbell born in Atlanta? TREC Corpus: NYT19981231.0193 Yes high A location described as an entity's native location implies the entity was born at that location. Catherine_Wood_Campbell born was in Atlanta . The Red Sox started wearing numbers on their backs in 1931, and first retired numbers May 29, 1984, when they honored Williams and Cronin. Did the Red Sox wear numbers on their backs in 1984? TREC Corpus: NYT20000904.0052 Yes Retiring something can mean to cease to use it. Wearing is a kind of using. TEMPORAL medium Yes Retiring something can mean to cease to use it. Wearing is a kind of using. The Red Sox is a baseball team. Baseball season started before May 29 in 1984. medium The Red_Sox did wear numbers on their backs in 1984 . Goldstein was born on Sept. 23, 1922, in Denver and died in Chicago on June 20, 1944. Was Goldstein born in Chicago? No An entity can only be born in one place. high Unknown medium Goldstein born was in Chicago . Walden thinks Lukas-trained Grand Slam, who is 4 for 4 at Belmont and 0 for 4 elsewhere, must be respected because of that statistic. Does Walden think Grand Slam deserves respect? TREC Corpus: NYT19980604.0347 Yes high No high Walden does think Grand Slam deserves respect . Lehr has become a major force on the Trojans' pitching staff, despite the fact that his pitching career at this level is still in its infancy. Has Lehr had a short pitching career? TREC Corpus: NYT19990506.0002 Yes Something in its infancy is relatively short [in lifespan/duration]. medium Unknown The sentence only states that his pitching career _at_this_level_ is in its infancy, but does not mention his pitching career before he got to this level. The question asks about his pitching career in general. Thus, the phrase "is still in its infancy" does not apply. medium Lehr has had a short pitching career . Planning for Islands of Adventure was already under way in 1990 when Universal Studios opened doors to its first Orlando park, Universal Studios Florida. Did planning for Islands of Adventure begin after Universal Studios Florida opened? TREC Corpus: NYT19990521.0214 No high "Already under way" implies "has begun." Opening doors to something implies that the something is open. Planning for Islands of Adventure did begin after Universal_Studios_Florida opened . If truth is the first casualty in war, then dignity was the first principle to keel over in the dirty little war in Washington. Is truth the first casualty in war? TREC Corpus: NYT19990205.0092 Unknown high Yes CONDITIONAL medium The CONDITIONAL context type is assumed to include both the premise and the conclusion of the conditional statement. This is because for a conditional context to be true, its condition must be true. This is not abduction, because the statement contained in the context may be independently true on its own, but the context itself is tied to its condition. Truth is the first casualty in war . The mistake most beginners make is in loading too much paint on the bristles. Do people who are new to painting often load too much paint on the brush? TREC Corpus: NYT20000802.0213 Yes "X's mistake is Y" implies that "X is doing Y." high An entity described as "new to" something can also be described as a "beginner" at that something. Bristles are part of a brush. If most of a category of entities do something, instances of that category can be described as "often" doing that something. People who are new to painting often load do too much paint on the brush . In the next few decades, unless Japan somehow manages to arrest current trends, it may find that its share of global economic output has shrunk considerably. Will Japan's share of global economic output decrease in the next few decades? TREC Corpus: NYT19990731.0084 Yes CONDITIONAL and POSSIBILITY high Unknown CONDITIONAL high Unknown POSSIBILITY high Unknown high Yes high Will Japan 's share of global economic output decrease in the next few decades ? Fiscal hawks on Capitol Hill vowed Monday to vote against the embassy security measures unless they are paid for by cuts elsewhere in the administration's budget. Will fiscal hawks on Capitol Hill vote against the embassy security measures? TREC Corpus: NYT19980921.0404 Unknown Vowing to do something does not mean it will always be done. high Yes Vowing to do something is a strong indication it will be done. high Yes Vowing to do something is a strong indication it will be done. Government budgets are rarely cut. medium Yes VOLITIONAL high Vowing indicates a strong intention which falls under the VOLITIONAL context. Unknown high Fiscal hawks on Capitol_Hill will vote against the embassy security measures . The FDA has no authority to regulate creatine unless it's first proved to be dangerous. Has creatine been proven to be dangerous? TREC Corpus: NYT19980812.0145 Unknown high Yes high Creatine has been proven to be dangerous . American officials now say they believe that Muhammad was warned by someone in the Qatar government and that he was staying at the estate of Abdallah bin Khalid, a fundamentalist who has provided support for other Islamic radicals. A former American intelligence official said bin Laden also visited bin Khalid in Qatar twice in the mid-1990s. Was Muhammad staying at the estate of Abdallah bin Khalid? TREC Corpus: NYT19990707.0365 Yes REPORT and BELIEF medium Unknown REPORT medium The text does not itself assert the question. The American officials believe it might be true. Yes REPORT medium The text does not itself assert the question. The American officials believe it might be true. Unknown BELIEF medium The text does not itself assert the question. The American officials report their belief. Yes BELIEF medium The text does not itself assert the question. The American officials report their belief. Unknown medium Yes medium Muhammad staying was at the estate of Abdallah_bin_Khalid . Annabelle Irwin, a retired Iowa State English professor who drew on her experience as a high school teacher in collaborating on an acclaimed series of books for young teen-agers, died Sept. 13 at a daughter's home in Des Moines, Iowa. Did Irwin teach high school in Iowa? TREC Corpus: NYT19980919.0143 Yes An institution named -state- State is usually a public university from -state-. A professor physically works at an educational institution. A person that worked for a long time, retired and died in a single state probably lived there most of their life, including previous jobs. Professors usually keep their jobs for a long time. medium There is nothing in the text to even directly suggest the response to the question. However, by default (in the absence of any other information), given the context in the passage, a human would likely assume this response. I don't know how any system could get this however without a long set of possibly contrived world knowledge. Yes high This is the cautious annotation ("unknown" for a "yes" response). Unknown high This is another cautious annotation (polarity "true" for an "unknown" response). Yes SPATIAL medium If the detection of the SPATIAL context (Iowa) could be extended to include "her experience as a high school teacher," possibly using specialized world knowledge, then we could plausibly say "yes." The world knowledge would probably look something like that in the "because" tag of answer 1, but more specific to spatial contexts. Irwin did teach high school in Iowa . The board frequently has engaged in public disputes and has been accused by the federal court of making decisions based on narrow agendas and meddling where it shouldn't. Does the board often make decisions based on narrow agendas? TREC Corpus: NYT19991119.0016 Yes "Making decisions" usually describes multiple events. A statement about an event that occurs multiple times can sometimes be described as occurring "often." An accusation may plausibly considered to be true; but that is a weak and naive assumption. BELIEF medium Yes An accusation is not a strong enough statement to be considered true on its face. high Unknown An accusation is not a strong enough statement to be considered true on its face. high Yes "Making decisions" usually describes multiple events. A statement about an event that occurs multiple times can sometimes be described as occurring "often." BELIEF high Within the context of the accusation (a type of BELIEF context), the content of the accusation is strictly true. The board often does make decisions based on narrow agendas . Fabric awning prices are more varied than aluminum awning prices, according to Kevin Tatman, owner of Merit Awnings in Dayton. Merit, in business since 1979, has always sold aluminum awnings and started selling Sunbrela brand fabric awnings about eight years ago. Are fabric awning prices more varied than aluminum awning prices? TREC Corpus: NYT20000705.0326 Yes A person in a particular business/industry for a long time has strong credibility when making statements about that business/industry. high The "because" field is too general to be applied directly here... not sure what else to add to it. Yes REPORT high In the context of Kevin Tatman's assertion, the response is true. Unknown high Yes high Fabric are awning prices more varied than aluminum awning prices . Increasingly, health experts and researchers are naming the nation's penchant for large portions and "supersizing" as a leading cause of obesity. Does supersizing cause obesity? TREC Corpus: NYT20000704.0053 Yes Effects can have multiple causes. Each cause can plausibly be said to "cause" the effect. Experts and researchers are generally credible. REPORT medium Yes Effects can have multiple causes. Sometimes, no single cause alone will create the effect. Although experts and researchers are generally credible, they are sometimes wrong. REPORT medium Yes Effects can have multiple causes. Each cause can plausibly be said to "cause" the effect. REPORT medium Yes REPORT medium Supersizing does cause obesity . Dual-core chips can do the same work that a single-core chip can, only faster, while consuming less power and at a cooler temperature. Do dual-core chips consume more power than single-core chips? http://www.forbes.com/technology/personaltech/2005/04/08/cx_ah_0408amd.html Yes high Unknown high No high Dual-core chips do consume more power than single-core chips . Duke initially planned on giving every new student a free iPod, but now only plans on giving iPods to students in certain classes. Does Duke plan on giving every new student a free iPod? http://news.designtechnica.com/article7065.html No high Yes high Unknown high Does_Duke plan on giving every new student a free iPod ? A US judge late on Thursday threw out Mr Kerkorian's claims that Daimler had fraudulently described the 1998 deal bringing together Daimler-Benz and Chrysler as a merger rather than a takeover to avoid paying a premium. Does the judge think Daimler fraudlently described the 1998 deal to avoid paying a premium? http://news.ft.com/cms/s/ed4370a4-a84f-11d9-87a9-00000e2511c8.html No Judges dismiss claims if they are not made to believe their content/convinced by their content. The judge takes the decision to dismiss the claim. No jury is present. medium Unknown medium Yes low Yes The decision to dismiss the claim is not up to the judge. A jury is present. medium The judge does think Daimler fraudlently described the 1998 deal to avoid paying a premium . A US judge late on Thursday threw out Mr Kerkorian's claims that Daimler had fraudulently described the 1998 deal bringing together Daimler-Benz and Chrysler as a merger rather than a takeover to avoid paying a premium. Does Mr Kerkorian think Daimler fraudlently described the 1998 deal to avoid paying a premium? http://news.ft.com/cms/s/ed4370a4-a84f-11d9-87a9-00000e2511c8.html Yes If the judge threw out Mr Kerkorian's claims, then Mr Kerkorian (strongly) thought that Daimler fraudlently described the 1998 deal to avoid paying a premium and, most likely, he still thinks that. The claim in front of a judge shows the person's convinction. medium No Making a claim does not entail believing the content of the claim. Sometimes people say things they don't believe. medium Unknown medium Mr_Kerkorian does think Daimler fraudlently described the 1998 deal to avoid paying a premium . MG Rover is on the brink of collapse after Britain refused to provide $100 million in emergency funding and component suppliers withdrew their support, forcing the car-maker to halt production. Does MG Rover make cars? http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=1&theme=&usrsess=1&id=73525 Yes MG Rover corefers with the car-maker and then present of "is on the brink of collapse" implies that they didn't collapse or halt production. TEMPORAL medium Yes "forcing" is present continuous tense. medium No "forcing" is present continuous tense. medium Unknown medium Yes The questions asks if MG Rover makes cars in general, not that if it would make them NOW that it appears to be on the brink of collapse. (Does MG Rover make cars (in general)?) medium MG Rover does make cars . A World Trade Organization (WTO) appeals panel Thursday ruled that although the United States can continue with its restrictions on internet gambling, some of the rules imposed by the country were discriminatory to foreign operators. Does the United States have internet gambling restrictions? http://www.newratings.com/analyst_news/article_768319.html Yes high No high The United_States does have internet gambling restrictions . Video games have provided one of the last refuges from the ubiquitous advertising that hits consumers from every direction. Do video games contain advertisements? http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/11364926.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp No video games offer refuge from the omnipresent ads means that advertisement is not present in video games. In case of advertising and video games, "is present" translates in "contains". The refuge from ads is still provided. high Unknown high Video games do contain advertisements . Bocelli grew up among the vineyards and olive groves of his estate in Lajatico, a community in rural Tuscany near Pisa. Does Bocelli have a home in Tuscany? TREC Corpus: NYT19990120.0079 Yes Bocelli's estate in Tuscany includes a house. He didn't sell the house after growing up. medium Unknown The passage doesn't mention if Bocelli still lives in Tuscany. medium Bocelli does have a home in Tuscany . Mike Campbell dented his car door in an accident on Friday. Does Mike's car have a dent? Yes If the door has a dent, then the car has a dent. The car door wasn't fix in the meantime. TEMPORAL medium Unknown medium Does Mike 's car have a dent ? Two sisters who know their mother had genetic testing before she died of ovarian cancer want to find out her test results. Did cancer cause their mother's death? TREC Corpus: NYT20000720.0341 Yes high No high Unknown high Cancer did cause their mother 's death . Marc Vaughn didn't kill the four hostages with a gun, he used a knife. Did Vaughn use a gun to kill the four hostages? No high No "kill with a gun" is equivalent to "use a gun to kill". high Unknown high Vaughn did use a gun to kill the four hostages . Early in the 1990s, Chinese officials made land available for a new hospital, and money for construction and operating costs. Did officials from China make land available for a new hospital? TREC Corpus: NYT19980714.0077 Yes high Unknown The officials from China might be natives of other countries. medium No medium Officials from China did make land available for a new hospital . Odds changers, or jinglers, attempt to gain favorable odds by dumping large amounts of money on a particular horse, then canceling the bet at the last moment in order to make a second bet at better odds. Odds changers , or jinglers , attempt to gain favorable odds by dumping large amounts of money on a particular horse , then canceling the bet at the last moment in order to make a second bet at better odds . Odds NNS Odd odds 0.0666666666666667 changers NNS changer changer , , , , or CC or or 0.0117647058823529 jinglers NNS jingler jingler , , , , attempt VBP attempt attempt 0.166666666666667 to TO to to gain VB gain gain 0.05 favorable JJ favor favorable 0.0303030303030303 odds NNS odd odds 0.0666666666666667 by IN by by dumping VBG dump dump 0.25 large JJ larg large 0.0026525198938992 amounts NNS amount amount 0.0285714285714286 of IN of of money NN monei money 0.00367647058823529 on IN on on a DT a a particular JJ particular particular 0.00558659217877095 horse NN hors horse 0.00840336134453781 , , , , then RB then then 7.27272727272727E-4 canceling VBG cancel cancel 1.0 the DT the the bet NN bet bet 0.142857142857143 at IN at at the DT the the last JJ last last 0.00151745068285281 moment NN moment moment 0.0040650406504065 in_order IN in_ord in to TO to to make VB make make 0.00161550888529887 a DT a a second JJ second second 0.00284090909090909 bet NN bet bet 0.142857142857143 at IN at at better JJR better better 0.00355871886120996 odds NNS odd odds 0.0666666666666667 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Odds) (NX (NX (NNS changers)) (, ,) (CC or) (NX (NNS jinglers)) (, ,))) (VP (VBP attempt) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB gain) (NP (JJ favorable) (NNS odds)) (PP (IN by) (S (VP (VBG dumping) (NP (NP (JJ large) (NNS amounts)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN money)))) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT a) (JJ particular) (NN horse))) (, ,) (S (ADVP (RB then)) (VP (VBG canceling) (NP (DT the) (NN bet)) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (JJ last) (NN moment)))))))) (SBAR (IN in_order) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (NP (DT a) (JJ second) (NN bet)) (PP (IN at) (NP (JJR better) (NNS odds))))))))))) (. .)) IN_by 9 13 IN_of 15 17 IN_on 13 21 IN_at 24 30 IN_at 33 39 dep 5 1 dep 5 2 nsubj 7 5 xsubj 9 5 aux 9 8 purpcl 7 9 xcomp 7 9 amod 11 10 dobj 9 11 amod 15 14 dobj 13 15 det 21 19 amod 21 20 advmod 24 23 partmod 13 24 det 26 25 dobj 24 26 det 30 28 amod 30 29 mark 33 31 aux 33 32 advcl 9 33 det 36 34 amod 36 35 dobj 33 36 amod 39 38 arg0 7 5 arg1 7 9 arg0 9 5 arg1 9 11 argm-tmp 9 33 argm-mnr 9 12 arg0 13 5 argm-adv 13 24 argm-mnr 13 21 arg1 13 15 argm-tmp 24 23 arg1 24 26 arg0 24 5 argm-tmp 24 30 arg0 33 5 argm-loc 33 39 arg1 33 36 Do jinglers get better odds? Jinglers do get better odds . Jinglers NNS Jingler jinglers do VBP do do 0.00170068027210884 get VB get get 0.00172711571675302 better JJR better better 0.00355871886120996 odds NNS odd odds 0.0666666666666667 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Jinglers)) (VP (VBP do) (VP (VB get) (NP (JJR better) (NNS odds)))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 amod 5 4 dobj 3 5 arg1 2 3 arg0 2 1 arg0 3 1 arg1 3 5 As mentioned, IBM has opted for the mouse stick in the middle of the keyboard instead of the little trackball or the little panel you diddle with your finger. As mentioned , IBM has opted for the mouse stick in the middle of the keyboard instead of the little trackball or the little panel you diddle with your finger . As IN As as mentioned VBN mention mention 0.0166666666666667 , , , , IBM NNP IBM IBM NNP 0 ORGANIZATION has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 opted VBN opt opt for IN for for the DT the the mouse NN mous mouse 0.125 stick NN stick stick 0.0357142857142857 in IN in in the DT the the middle NN middl middle 0.0196078431372549 of IN of of the DT the the keyboard NN keyboard keyboard 0.25 instead RB instead instead 0.00578034682080925 of IN of of the DT the the little JJ littl little 0.0013869625520111 trackball NN trackbal trackball or CC or or 0.0117647058823529 the DT the the little JJ littl little 0.0013869625520111 panel NN panel panel 0.03125 you PRP you you diddle VBP diddl diddle with IN with with your PRP$ your your finger NN finger finger 0.0217391304347826 . . . . (ROOT (S (SBAR (IN As) (S (VP (VBN mentioned)))) (, ,) (NP (NNP IBM)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN opted) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN mouse) (NN stick)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN middle)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN keyboard)) (PP (RB instead) (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ little) (NN trackball)))))))) (CC or) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ little) (NN panel)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP diddle) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP$ your) (NN finger))))))))))) (. .)) IN_for 6 10 IN_in 10 13 IN_of 13 16 IN_of 16 21 IN_with 27 30 mark 2 1 advcl 6 2 nsubj 6 4 aux 6 5 det 10 8 nn 10 9 det 13 12 det 16 15 dep 16 17 det 21 19 amod 21 20 det 25 23 amod 25 24 or 10 25 nsubj 27 26 rcmod 25 27 poss 30 29 arg1 2 4 arg0 5 4 arg1 5 6 argm-adv 5 2 arg1 6 10 arg0 6 4 argm-tmp 6 2 arg0 27 26 arg1 27 25 arg2 27 30 Do IBM keyboards have a mouse stick? IBM keyboards do have a mouse stick . IBM NNP IBM IBM NNP 0 ORGANIZATION keyboards NNS keyboard keyboard do VBP do do 0.00170068027210884 have VB have have 5.98802395209581E-4 a DT a a mouse NN mous mouse 0.125 stick NN stick stick 0.0357142857142857 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP IBM) (NNS keyboards)) (VP (VBP do) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT a) (NN mouse) (NN stick)))) (. .)) nn 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 det 7 5 nn 7 6 dobj 4 7 arg0 3 2 arg1 3 4 arg0 4 2 arg1 4 7 Born July 5, 1917, Catherine Wood Campbell left her native Atlanta, where she had attended Sacred Heart School and graduated from the Washington Seminary, in the 1930s. Born July 5 , 1917 , Catherine Wood Campbell left her native Atlanta , where she had attended Sacred Heart School and graduated from the Washington Seminary , in the 1930s . Born VBN Born born 0.00892857142857143 July NNP Juli July NNP 0 DATE 07/05/1917 5 CD 5 5 CD 1 DATE 07/05/1917 , , , , , 2 DATE 07/05/1917 1917 CD 1917 1917 CD 3 DATE 07/05/1917 , , , , Catherine_Wood_Campbell NNP Catherine_Wood_Campbel catherine NNP 4 PERSON left VBD left leave 0.0050251256281407 her PRP$ her she native JJ nativ native 0.0256410256410256 Atlanta NNP Atlanta Atlanta NNP 5 LOCATION , , , , where WRB where where 0.00106837606837607 she PRP she she had VBD had have 2.02634245187437E-4 attended VBN attend attend 0.0909090909090909 Sacred_Heart_School NNP Sacred_Heart_School sacred NNP 6 ORGANIZATION and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 graduated VBN graduat graduate 0.125 from IN from from the DT the the Washington_Seminary NNP Washington_Seminari washington NNP 7 LOCATION , , , , in IN in in the DT the the 1930s NNS 1930 1930 NNS 8 DATE 01/01/1930 . . . . (ROOT (S (S (VP (VBN Born) (NP-TMP (NNP July) (CD 5) (, ,) (CD 1917)))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Catherine_Wood_Campbell)) (VP (VBD left) (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ native) (NNP Atlanta)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VP (VBN attended) (NP (NNP Sacred_Heart_School))) (CC and) (VP (VBN graduated) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NNP Washington_Seminary))) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNS 1930s))))))))) (. .)) IN_from 19 22 IN_in 19 26 ccomp 8 1 tmod 1 2 num 2 3 num 2 5 nsubj 8 7 poss 11 9 amod 11 10 dobj 8 11 advmod 16 13 nsubj 16 14 aux 16 15 dep 8 16 dobj 16 17 and 16 19 det 22 21 det 26 25 arg1 1 7 argm-adv 8 16 arg1 8 11 argm-adv 8 1 arg0 8 7 argm-loc 15 13 arg1 15 16 arg0 15 14 arg1 16 17 arg0 16 14 argm-loc 19 26 arg1 19 22 arg0 19 14 Was Catherine Wood Campbell born in Atlanta? Catherine_Wood_Campbell born was in Atlanta . Catherine_Wood_Campbell NNP Catherine_Wood_Campbel catherine born NNP born born was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 in IN in in Atlanta NNP Atlanta Atlanta NNP 0 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Catherine_Wood_Campbell) (NNP born)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Atlanta)))) (. .)) IN_in 3 5 nn 2 1 nsubj 3 2 arg1 3 2 argm-loc 3 5 The Red Sox started wearing numbers on their backs in 1931, and first retired numbers May 29, 1984, when they honored Williams and Cronin. The Red Sox started wearing numbers on their backs in 1931 , and first retired numbers May 29 , 1984 , when they honored Williams and Cronin . The DT The the Red_Sox NNP Red_Sox red NNP 0 ORGANIZATION started VBD start start 0.00704225352112676 wearing VBG wear wear 0.0217391304347826 numbers NNS number number 0.0080 on IN on on their PRP$ their their backs NNS back back 0.0833333333333333 in IN in in 1931 CD 1931 1931 CD 1 DATE 01/01/1931 , , , , and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 first RB first first 0.00316455696202532 retired VBD retir retire 0.0909090909090909 numbers NNS number number 0.0080 May NNP Mai May NNP 2 DATE 05/29/1984 29 CD 29 29 CD 3 DATE 05/29/1984 , , , , , 4 DATE 05/29/1984 1984 CD 1984 1984 CD 5 DATE 05/29/1984 , , , , when WRB when when 4.30292598967298E-4 they PRP thei they honored VBZ honor honor Williams NNP William Williams NNP 6 PERSON and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 Cronin NNP Cronin Cronin NNP 7 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Red_Sox)) (VP (VP (VBD started) (NP (VBG wearing) (NNS numbers)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS backs)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1931)))))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (ADVP (RB first)) (VBD retired) (NP (NNS numbers)) (NP-TMP (NNP May) (CD 29) (, ,) (CD 1984)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBZ honored) (NP (NNP Williams) (CC and) (NNP Cronin))))))) (. .)) IN_on 3 8 IN_in 8 10 det 2 1 nsubj 3 2 amod 5 4 dobj 3 5 poss 8 7 advmod 14 13 and 3 14 dobj 14 15 tmod 14 16 num 16 17 num 16 19 advmod 23 21 nsubj 23 22 dep 14 23 dobj 23 24 and 24 26 arg1 3 5 arg0 3 2 argm-loc 3 8 arg1 4 5 arg1 14 15 arg0 14 2 argm-tmp 14 23 argm-tmp 14 13 arg1 23 24 arg0 23 22 argm-tmp 23 21 Did the Red Sox wear numbers on their backs in 1984? The Red_Sox did wear numbers on their backs in 1984 . The DT The the Red_Sox NNP Red_Sox red did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 wear VB wear wear 0.0434782608695652 numbers NNS number number 0.0080 on IN on on their PRP$ their their backs NNS back back 0.0833333333333333 in IN in in 1984 CD 1984 1984 CD 0 DATE 01/01/1984 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Red_Sox)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB wear) (NP (NP (NNS numbers)) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS backs)))) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1984))))) (. .)) IN_on 5 8 IN_in 4 10 det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 dobj 4 5 poss 8 7 arg1 3 4 arg0 3 2 arg1 4 5 argm-tmp 4 10 arg0 4 2 Goldstein was born on Sept. 23, 1922, in Denver and died in Chicago on June 20, 1944. Goldstein was born on Sept. 23 , 1922 , in Denver and died in Chicago on June 20 , 1944 . Goldstein NNP Goldstein Goldstein NNP 0 PERSON was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 born VBN born bear 0.00892857142857143 on IN on on Sept. NNP Sept. Sept. NNP 1 DATE 09/23/1922 23 CD 23 23 CD 2 DATE 09/23/1922 , , , , , 3 DATE 09/23/1922 1922 CD 1922 1922 CD 4 DATE 09/23/1922 , , , , in IN in in Denver NNP Denver Denver NNP 5 LOCATION and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 died VBN di die 0.0454545454545455 in IN in in Chicago NNP Chicago Chicago NNP 6 LOCATION on IN on on June NNP June June NNP 7 DATE 06/20/1944 20 CD 20 20 CD 8 DATE 06/20/1944 , , , , , 9 DATE 06/20/1944 1944 CD 1944 1944 CD 10 DATE 06/20/1944 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Goldstein)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VP (VBN born) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (NNP Sept.) (CD 23) (, ,) (CD 1922) (, ,)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Denver)))))) (CC and) (VP (VBN died) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Chicago))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP June) (CD 20) (, ,) (CD 1944)))))) (. .)) IN_on 3 5 IN_in 5 11 IN_in 13 15 IN_on 13 17 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 num 5 6 num 5 8 and 3 13 num 17 18 num 17 20 arg1 2 3 arg1 2 1 argm-loc 3 5 arg1 3 1 argm-loc 13 15 arg1 13 1 argm-tmp 13 17 Was Goldstein born in Chicago? Goldstein born was in Chicago . Goldstein NNP Goldstein Goldstein NNP 0 PERSON born NNP born born was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 in IN in in Chicago NNP Chicago Chicago NNP 1 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Goldstein) (NNP born)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Chicago)))) (. .)) IN_in 3 5 nn 2 1 nsubj 3 2 arg1 3 2 argm-loc 3 5 Walden thinks Lukas-trained Grand Slam, who is 4 for 4 at Belmont and 0 for 4 elsewhere, must be respected because of that statistic. Walden thinks Lukas-trained Grand Slam , who is 4 for 4 at Belmont and 0 for 4 elsewhere , must be respected because of that statistic . Walden NNP Walden Walden NNP 0 PERSON thinks VBZ think think 0.0434782608695652 Lukas-trained NNP Lukas-train Lukas-trained Grand_Slam NNP Grand_Slam grand , , , , who WP who who 4.4404973357016E-4 is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 4 CD 4 4 for IN for for 4 CD 4 4 at IN at at Belmont NNP Belmont Belmont NNP 1 ORGANIZATION and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 0 CD 0 0 for IN for for 4 CD 4 4 elsewhere RB elsewher elsewhere 0.0227272727272727 , , , , must MD must must 0.00100200400801603 be VB be be 0.0285714285714286 respected VBN respect respect 0.142857142857143 because RB becaus because 0.0588235294117647 of IN of of that DT that that statistic NN statist statistic . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Walden)) (VP (VBZ thinks) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (NNP Lukas-trained) (NNP Grand_Slam)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NP (CD 4)) (PP (IN for) (NP (CD 4))) (PP (IN at) (NP (NNP Belmont)))) (CC and) (NP (NP (CD 0)) (PP (IN for) (NP (CD 4))))) (ADVP (RB elsewhere))))) (, ,)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN respected) (PP (RB because) (IN of) (NP (DT that) (NN statistic))))))))) (. .)) IN_for 8 10 IN_at 8 12 IN_for 14 16 IN_of 21 25 nsubj 2 1 nn 4 3 nsubjpass 21 4 rel 8 6 nsubj 8 4 cop 8 7 rcmod 4 8 and 8 14 advmod 8 17 aux 21 19 auxpass 21 20 ccomp 2 21 dep 21 22 det 25 24 arg0 2 1 arg1 2 21 argm-loc 7 17 arg1 7 6 arg2 7 8 arg1 7 4 arg1 20 4 argm-mod 20 19 argm-cau 21 25 arg1 21 4 argm-mod 21 19 Does Walden think Grand Slam deserves respect? Walden does think Grand Slam deserves respect . Walden NNP Walden Walden NNP 0 PERSON does VBZ doe do 0.00215982721382289 think VB think think 0.00490196078431373 Grand_Slam NNP Grand_Slam grand deserves VBZ deserv deserve 0.0625 respect NN respect respect 0.00819672131147541 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Walden)) (VP (VBZ does) (S (VP (VB think) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Grand_Slam)) (VP (VBZ deserves) (NP (NN respect)))))))) (. .)) nsubj 2 1 ccomp 2 3 nsubj 5 4 ccomp 3 5 dobj 5 6 arg1 2 3 arg0 2 1 arg0 3 1 arg1 3 5 arg1 5 6 arg0 5 4 Lehr has become a major force on the Trojans' pitching staff, despite the fact that his pitching career at this level is still in its infancy. Lehr has become a major force on the Trojans ' pitching staff , despite the fact that his pitching career at this level is still in its infancy . Lehr NNP Lehr Lehr NNP 0 PERSON has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 become VBN becom become 0.00714285714285714 a DT a a major JJ major major 0.00418410041841004 force NN forc force 0.00571428571428571 on IN on on the DT the the Trojans NNP Trojan Trojans NNP 1 ORGANIZATION ' POS ' ' pitching NN pitch pitching 0.166666666666667 staff NN staff staff 0.00961538461538462 , , , , despite IN despit despite the DT the the fact NN fact fact 0.00224215246636771 that IN that that his PRP$ hi his pitching NN pitch pitching 0.166666666666667 career NN career career 0.0149253731343284 at IN at at this DT thi this level NN level level 0.00432900432900433 is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 still RB still still 0.00127551020408163 in IN in in its PRP$ it its infancy NN infanc infancy 0.0909090909090909 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Lehr)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN become) (NP (DT a) (JJ major) (NN force)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Trojans) (POS ')) (NN pitching) (NN staff))) (, ,) (PP (IN despite) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN fact)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (PRP$ his) (NN pitching) (NN career)) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT this) (NN level)))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB still)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN infancy)))))))))) (. .)) IN_on 6 12 IN_despite 6 16 IN_at 20 23 IN_in 24 28 nsubj 6 1 aux 6 2 cop 6 3 det 6 4 amod 6 5 det 9 8 poss 12 9 nn 12 11 det 16 15 complm 24 17 poss 20 18 nn 20 19 nsubj 24 20 det 23 22 rcmod 16 24 advmod 24 25 poss 28 27 arg0 2 1 arg1 2 6 arg2 3 6 arg1 3 1 argm-adv 3 16 argm-loc 24 28 argm-tmp 24 25 arg1 24 20 Has Lehr had a short pitching career? Lehr has had a short pitching career . Lehr NNP Lehr Lehr NNP 0 PERSON has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 had VBN had have 0.00518134715025907 a DT a a short JJ short short 0.00458715596330275 pitching NN pitch pitching 0.166666666666667 career NN career career 0.0149253731343284 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Lehr)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN had) (NP (DT a) (JJ short) (NN pitching) (NN career)))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 det 7 4 amod 7 5 nn 7 6 dobj 3 7 arg1 2 3 arg0 2 1 arg1 3 7 arg0 3 1 Planning for Islands of Adventure was already under way in 1990 when Universal Studios opened doors to its first Orlando park, Universal Studios Florida. Planning for Islands of Adventure was already under way in 1990 when Universal Studios opened doors to its first Orlando park , Universal Studios Florida . Planning NNP Plan Planning for IN for for Islands_of_Adventure NNP Islands_of_Adventur islands NNP 0 ORGANIZATION was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 already RB alreadi already 0.00366300366300366 under IN under under way NN wai way 0.00110497237569061 in IN in in 1990 CD 1990 1990 CD 1 DATE 01/01/1990 when WRB when when 4.30292598967298E-4 Universal_Studios NNP Universal_Studio universal NNP 2 ORGANIZATION opened_doors VBD opened_door opened to TO to to its PRP$ it its first JJ first first 9.87166831194472E-4 Orlando NNP Orlando Orlando NNP 3 LOCATION park NN park park 0.0217391304347826 , , , , Universal_Studios_Florida NNP Universal_Studios_Florida universal NNP 4 ORGANIZATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Planning)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNP Islands_of_Adventure)))) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB already)) (PP (IN under) (NP (NP (NN way)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1990))))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (NNP Universal_Studios)) (VP (VBD opened_doors) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ first) (NNP Orlando) (NN park)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Universal_Studios_Florida)))))))) (. .)) IN_for 1 3 IN_under 4 7 IN_in 7 9 IN_to 12 17 nsubj 4 1 advmod 4 5 advmod 12 10 nsubj 12 11 ccomp 4 12 poss 17 14 amod 17 15 nn 17 16 appos 17 19 argm-tmp 4 5 argm-tmp 4 12 arg1 4 1 argm-tmp 4 7 argm-tmp 12 10 arg0 12 11 arg2 12 17 Did planning for Islands of Adventure begin after Universal Studios Florida opened? Planning for Islands of Adventure did begin after Universal_Studios_Florida opened . Planning NNP Plan Planning for IN for for Islands_of_Adventure NNP Islands_of_Adventur islands NNP 0 ORGANIZATION did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 begin VB begin begin 0.0196078431372549 after IN after after Universal_Studios_Florida NNP Universal_Studios_Florida universal NNP 1 ORGANIZATION opened VBD open open 0.0101010101010101 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Planning)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNP Islands_of_Adventure)))) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB begin) (SBAR (IN after) (S (NP (NNP Universal_Studios_Florida)) (VP (VBD opened)))))) (. .)) IN_for 1 3 nsubj 5 1 aux 5 4 mark 8 6 nsubj 8 7 advcl 5 8 arg1 4 5 arg0 4 1 argm-tmp 5 8 arg1 5 1 arg1 8 7 If truth is the first casualty in war, then dignity was the first principle to keel over in the dirty little war in Washington. If truth is the first casualty in war , then dignity was the first principle to keel over in the dirty little war in Washington . If IN If if truth NN truth truth 0.0080 is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 the DT the the first JJ first first 9.87166831194472E-4 casualty NN casualti casualty 0.5 in IN in in war NN war war 0.00303951367781155 , , , , then RB then then 7.27272727272727E-4 dignity NN digniti dignity 0.0285714285714286 was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 the DT the the first_principle NN first_principl first to TO to to keel_over VB keel_ov keel in IN in in the DT the the dirty JJ dirti dirty 0.0588235294117647 little JJ littl little 0.0013869625520111 war NN war war 0.00303951367781155 in IN in in Washington NNP Washington Washington NNP 0 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (SBAR (IN If) (S (NP (NN truth)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ first) (NN casualty)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN war))))))) (, ,) (NP (RB then) (NN dignity)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT the) (NN first_principle) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB keel_over) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ dirty) (JJ little) (NN war)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Washington)))))))))) (. .)) IN_in 6 8 IN_in 16 21 IN_in 21 23 mark 6 1 nsubj 6 2 cop 6 3 det 6 4 amod 6 5 advcl 14 6 dep 11 10 nsubj 14 11 cop 14 12 det 14 13 aux 16 15 infmod 14 16 det 21 18 amod 21 19 amod 21 20 arg1 3 2 arg1 3 6 arg2 12 14 arg1 12 11 argm-adv 12 6 arg0 16 11 arg1 16 21 Is truth the first casualty in war? Truth is the first casualty in war . Truth NNP Truth Truth is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 the DT the the first JJ first first 9.87166831194472E-4 casualty NN casualti casualty 0.5 in IN in in war NN war war 0.00303951367781155 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Truth)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ first) (NN casualty)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN war))))) (. .)) IN_in 5 7 nsubj 5 1 cop 5 2 det 5 3 amod 5 4 arg2 2 1 arg1 2 5 The mistake most beginners make is in loading too much paint on the bristles. The mistake most beginners make is in loading too much paint on the bristles . The DT The the mistake NN mistak mistake 0.0294117647058824 most RBS most most 0.00175746924428822 beginners JJ beginn beginners make VBP make make 0.00595238095238095 is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 in IN in in loading VBG load load 0.25 too_much JJ too_much too paint NN paint paint 0.0476190476190476 on IN on on the DT the the bristles NN bristl bristle . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN mistake)) (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ beginners))) (VP (VBP make) (SBAR (S (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN in) (S (VP (VBG loading) (NP (ADJP (JJ too_much)) (NN paint)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN bristles)))))))))) (. .)) IN_in 6 8 IN_on 8 13 det 2 1 nsubj 5 2 advmod 4 3 amod 2 4 ccomp 5 6 amod 10 9 dobj 8 10 det 13 12 arg0 5 2 arg1 5 6 arg1 6 8 arg2 8 13 arg1 8 10 Do people who are new to painting often load too much paint on the brush? People who are new to painting often load do too much paint on the brush . People NNS Peopl people 0.00118203309692671 who WP who who 4.4404973357016E-4 are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 new JJ new new 9.31098696461825E-4 to TO to to painting VBG paint paint 0.1 often RB often often 0.002710027100271 load NN load load 0.0227272727272727 do VBP do do 0.00170068027210884 too_much JJ too_much too paint NN paint paint 0.0476190476190476 on IN on on the DT the the brush NN brush brush 0.0416666666666667 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS People)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ new) (PP (TO to) (S (VP (VBG painting) (ADVP (RB often)) (NP (NN load)))))))))) (VP (VBP do) (NP (NP (ADJP (JJ too_much)) (NN paint)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN brush))))) (. .)) IN_to 4 6 IN_on 11 14 nsubj 9 1 rel 4 2 nsubj 4 1 cop 4 3 rcmod 1 4 advmod 6 7 dobj 6 8 amod 11 10 dobj 9 11 det 14 13 arg1 3 2 arg1 3 1 arg2 3 4 arg0 6 2 arg0 6 1 argm-tmp 6 7 arg1 6 8 arg0 9 1 arg1 9 11 In the next few decades, unless Japan somehow manages to arrest current trends, it may find that its share of global economic output has shrunk considerably. In the next few decades , unless Japan somehow manages to arrest current trends , it may find that its share of global economic output has shrunk considerably . In IN In in the DT the the next JJ next next 0.0029585798816568 few JJ few few 0.00166389351081531 decades NNS decad decade 0.0294117647058824 , , , , unless IN unless unless Japan NNP Japan Japan NNP 0 LOCATION somehow RB somehow somehow 0.0161290322580645 manages VBZ manag manage 0.25 to TO to to arrest VB arrest arrest 0.2 current JJ current current 0.0108695652173913 trends NNS trend trend 0.05 , , , , it PRP it it may MD mai may 7.69230769230769E-4 find VB find find 0.00343642611683849 that IN that that its PRP$ it its share NN share share 0.0163934426229508 of IN of of global JJ global global 0.25 economic JJ econom economic 0.00440528634361234 output NN output output 0.0277777777777778 has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 shrunk VBN shrunk shrink considerably RB consider considerably 0.0227272727272727 . . . . (ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (DT the) (JJ next) (JJ few) (NNS decades))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN unless) (S (NP (NNP Japan)) (ADVP (RB somehow)) (VP (VBZ manages) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB arrest) (NP (JJ current) (NNS trends)))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB find) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN share)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ global) (JJ economic) (NN output)))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN shrunk) (ADVP (RB considerably)))))))) (. .)) IN_in 18 5 IN_of 21 25 det 5 2 amod 5 3 amod 5 4 mark 10 7 nsubj 10 8 xsubj 12 8 advmod 10 9 dep 18 10 aux 12 11 purpcl 10 12 xcomp 10 12 amod 14 13 dobj 12 14 nsubj 18 16 aux 18 17 complm 27 19 poss 21 20 nsubj 27 21 amod 25 23 amod 25 24 aux 27 26 ccomp 18 27 advmod 27 28 arg1 10 12 argm-mnr 10 9 arg0 10 8 arg0 12 8 arg1 12 14 arg1 18 27 argm-loc 18 5 argm-mod 18 17 argm-adv 18 10 arg0 18 16 arg0 26 21 arg1 26 27 arg1 27 21 argm-mnr 27 28 Will Japan's share of global economic output decrease in the next few decades? Will Japan 's share of global economic output decrease in the next few decades ? Will NNP Will Will Japan NNP Japan Japan NNP 0 LOCATION 's POS 's 's share NN share share 0.0163934426229508 of IN of of global JJ global global 0.25 economic JJ econom economic 0.00440528634361234 output NN output output 0.0277777777777778 decrease VB decreas decrease 0.142857142857143 in IN in in the DT the the next JJ next next 0.0029585798816568 few JJ few few 0.00166389351081531 decades NNS decad decade 0.0294117647058824 ? . ? ? (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NP (NNP Will) (NNP Japan) (POS 's)) (NN share)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ global) (JJ economic) (NN output)))) (VP (VB decrease) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ next) (JJ few) (NNS decades)))) (. ?)) IN_of 4 8 IN_in 9 14 nn 2 1 poss 4 2 nsubj 9 4 amod 8 6 amod 8 7 det 14 11 amod 14 12 amod 14 13 argm-loc 9 14 arg1 9 4 Fiscal hawks on Capitol Hill vowed Monday to vote against the embassy security measures unless they are paid for by cuts elsewhere in the administration's budget. Fiscal hawks on Capitol Hill vowed Monday to vote against the embassy security measures unless they are paid for by cuts elsewhere in the administration 's budget . Fiscal JJ Fiscal fiscal 0.00854700854700855 hawks NNS hawk hawk on IN on on Capitol_Hill NNP Capitol_Hil capitol NNP 0 LOCATION vowed VBD vow vow 0.2 Monday NNP Mondai Monday NNP 1 DATE 01/01/1000 to TO to to vote VB vote vote 0.0416666666666667 against IN against against the DT the the embassy NN embassi embassy 0.125 security NN secur security 0.0133333333333333 measures NNS measur measure 0.0222222222222222 unless IN unless unless they PRP thei they are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 paid VBN paid pay 0.0113636363636364 for IN for for by IN by by cuts NNS cut cut 0.0526315789473684 elsewhere RB elsewher elsewhere 0.0227272727272727 in IN in in the DT the the administration NN administr administration 0.00884955752212389 's POS 's 's budget NN budget budget 0.0169491525423729 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJ Fiscal) (NNS hawks)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP Capitol_Hill)))) (VP (VBD vowed) (NP-TMP (NNP Monday)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB vote) (PP (IN against) (NP (DT the) (NN embassy) (NN security) (NNS measures))) (SBAR (IN unless) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN paid) (PP (IN for) (IN by) (NP (NP (NNS cuts)) (PP (ADVP (RB elsewhere)) (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN administration) (POS 's)) (NN budget))))))))))))) (. .)) IN_on 2 4 IN_against 8 13 agent 17 18 IN_in 20 26 amod 2 1 nsubj 5 2 xsubj 8 2 tmod 5 6 aux 8 7 purpcl 5 8 xcomp 5 8 det 13 10 nn 13 11 nn 13 12 mark 17 14 nsubjpass 17 15 auxpass 17 16 advcl 8 17 dep 17 20 dep 20 21 det 24 23 poss 26 24 arg0 5 2 arg1 5 8 arg0 8 2 argm-adv 8 17 arg1 8 13 arg2 16 17 arg1 16 15 arg0 17 20 arg1 17 15 Will fiscal hawks on Capitol Hill vote against the embassy security measures? Fiscal hawks on Capitol_Hill will vote against the embassy security measures . Fiscal JJ Fiscal fiscal 0.00854700854700855 hawks NNS hawk hawk on IN on on Capitol_Hill NNP Capitol_Hil capitol will MD will will 0.0294117647058824 vote VB vote vote 0.0416666666666667 against IN against against the DT the the embassy NN embassi embassy 0.125 security NN secur security 0.0133333333333333 measures NNS measur measure 0.0222222222222222 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJ Fiscal) (NNS hawks)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP Capitol_Hill)))) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB vote) (PP (IN against) (NP (DT the) (NN embassy) (NN security) (NNS measures))))) (. .)) IN_on 2 4 IN_against 6 11 amod 2 1 nsubj 6 2 aux 6 5 det 11 8 nn 11 9 nn 11 10 arg1 6 11 arg0 6 2 argm-mod 6 5 The FDA has no authority to regulate creatine unless it's first proved to be dangerous. The FDA has no authority to regulate creatine unless it 's first proved to be dangerous . The DT The the FDA NNP FDA FDA NNP 0 ORGANIZATION has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 no DT no no authority NN author authority 0.0120481927710843 to TO to to regulate VB regul regulate 0.5 creatine NN creatin creatine unless IN unless unless it PRP it it 's VBZ 's be first RB first first 0.00316455696202532 proved VBN prove prove 0.0555555555555556 to TO to to be VB be be 0.0285714285714286 dangerous JJ danger dangerous 0.0222222222222222 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP FDA)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (DT no) (NN authority) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB regulate) (NP (NN creatine)) (SBAR (IN unless) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB first)) (VP (VBN proved) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ dangerous)))))))))))))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 3 2 det 5 4 dobj 3 5 aux 7 6 infmod 5 7 dobj 7 8 mark 13 9 nsubjpass 13 10 xsubj 16 10 auxpass 13 11 advmod 13 12 advcl 7 13 aux 16 14 dep 16 15 purpcl 13 16 xcomp 13 16 arg0 3 2 arg1 3 5 arg0 7 2 arg1 7 8 argm-adv 7 13 arg1 11 13 arg0 11 10 argm-tmp 11 12 arg1 13 10 argm-tmp 13 12 arg1 13 16 arg1 15 16 Has creatine been proven to be dangerous? Creatine has been proven to be dangerous . Creatine NNP Creatin Creatine NNP 0 PERSON has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 been VBN been be 1.0 proven VBN proven prove 0.0909090909090909 to TO to to be VB be be 0.0285714285714286 dangerous JJ danger dangerous 0.0222222222222222 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Creatine)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN proven) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ dangerous)))))))) (. .)) nsubjpass 4 1 xsubj 7 1 aux 4 2 auxpass 4 3 aux 7 5 dep 7 6 purpcl 4 7 xcomp 4 7 arg1 2 4 arg0 2 1 arg1 3 4 arg1 3 1 arg1 4 7 arg1 4 1 arg1 6 7 American officials now say they believe that Muhammad was warned by someone in the Qatar government and that he was staying at the estate of Abdallah bin Khalid, a fundamentalist who has provided support for other Islamic radicals. A former American intelligence official said bin Laden also visited bin Khalid in Qatar twice in the mid-1990s. American officials now say they believe that Muhammad was warned by someone in the Qatar government and that he was staying at the estate of Abdallah bin Khalid , a fundamentalist who has provided support for other Islamic radicals . American NNP American American NNP 0 LOCATION officials NNS offici official 0.0166666666666667 now RB now now 7.71010023130301E-4 say VBP sai say 0.00636942675159236 they PRP thei they believe VBP believ believe 0.00847457627118644 that IN that that Muhammad NNP Muhammad Muhammad NNP 1 PERSON was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 warned VBN warn warn 0.111111111111111 by IN by by someone NN someon someone 0.0106382978723404 in IN in in the DT the the Qatar NNP Qatar Qatar government NN govern government 0.00251256281407035 and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 that IN that that he PRP he he was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 staying VBG stai stay 0.0666666666666667 at IN at at the DT the the estate NN estat estate 0.0208333333333333 of IN of of Abdallah_bin_Khalid NNP Abdallah_bin_Khalid abdallah NNP 2 PERSON , , , , a DT a a fundamentalist JJ fundamentalist fundamentalist 0.5 who WP who who 4.4404973357016E-4 has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 provided VBN provid provide 0.0116279069767442 support NN support support 0.0080 for IN for for other JJ other other 5.91715976331361E-4 Islamic JJ Islamic islamic 0.5 radicals NNS radic radical 0.25 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP American) (NNS officials)) (ADVP (RB now)) (VP (VBP say) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP believe) (SBAR (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP Muhammad)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN warned) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NN someone)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Qatar) (NN government))))))))) (CC and) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG staying) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN estate)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Abdallah_bin_Khalid)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ fundamentalist)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN provided) (NP (NP (NN support)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ other) (JJ Islamic) (NNS radicals)))))))))))))))))))))) (. .)) agent 10 12 IN_in 12 16 IN_at 21 24 IN_of 24 26 IN_for 33 37 nn 2 1 nsubj 4 2 advmod 4 3 nsubj 6 5 ccomp 4 6 dep 10 7 nsubjpass 10 8 auxpass 10 9 dep 6 10 det 16 14 nn 16 15 dep 21 18 nsubj 21 19 aux 21 20 and 10 21 det 24 23 det 29 28 appos 26 29 rel 32 30 nsubj 32 29 aux 32 31 rcmod 29 32 dobj 32 33 amod 37 35 amod 37 36 arg0 4 2 argm-tmp 4 3 arg1 4 6 arg1 6 10 arg0 6 5 arg1 9 8 arg1 9 10 arg1 10 8 arg0 10 12 arg1 20 21 arg1 20 19 argm-loc 21 24 arg1 21 19 arg0 31 29 arg0 31 30 arg1 31 32 arg0 32 29 arg0 32 30 arg1 32 33 A former American intelligence official said bin Laden also visited bin Khalid in Qatar twice in the mid-1990s . A DT A a former JJ former former 0.00769230769230769 American NNP American American NNP 0 LOCATION intelligence NN intellig intelligence 0.0227272727272727 official NN offici official 0.0357142857142857 said VBD said say 5.61167227833895E-4 bin_Laden NNP bin_Laden bin NNP 1 PERSON also RB also also 9.37207122774133E-4 visited VBD visit visit 0.04 bin_Khalid NNP bin_Khalid bin NNP 2 PERSON in IN in in Qatar NNP Qatar Qatar NNP 3 LOCATION twice RB twice twice 0.0149253731343284 in IN in in the DT the the mid-1990s NNS mid-1990 mid-1990s . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (JJ former) (NNP American) (NN intelligence) (NN official)) (VP (VBD said) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP bin_Laden)) (ADVP (RB also)) (VP (VBD visited) (NP (NNP bin_Khalid)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Qatar))) (PP (ADVP (RB twice)) (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNS mid-1990s))))))) (. .)) IN_in 9 12 IN_in 9 16 det 5 1 amod 5 2 nn 5 3 nn 5 4 nsubj 6 5 nsubj 9 7 advmod 9 8 ccomp 6 9 dobj 9 10 dep 9 13 det 16 15 arg0 6 5 arg1 6 9 arg0 9 7 arg1 9 10 argm-dis 9 8 argm-loc 9 12 argm-tmp 9 16 Was Muhammad staying at the estate of Abdallah bin Khalid? Muhammad staying was at the estate of Abdallah_bin_Khalid . Muhammad NNP Muhammad Muhammad NNP 0 PERSON staying NNP stai staying was VBD wa be 0.0476190476190476 at IN at at the DT the the estate NN estat estate 0.0208333333333333 of IN of of Abdallah_bin_Khalid NNP Abdallah_bin_Khalid abdallah . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Muhammad) (NNP staying)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN estate)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Abdallah_bin_Khalid)))))) (. .)) IN_at 3 6 IN_of 6 8 nn 2 1 nsubj 3 2 det 6 5 arg1 3 2 argm-loc 3 6 Annabelle Irwin, a retired Iowa State English professor who drew on her experience as a high school teacher in collaborating on an acclaimed series of books for young teen-agers, died Sept. 13 at a daughter's home in Des Moines, Iowa. Annabelle Irwin , a retired Iowa State English professor who drew on her experience as a high school teacher in collaborating on an acclaimed series of books for young teen-agers , died Sept. 13 at a daughter 's home in Des Moines , Iowa . Annabelle_Irwin NNP Annabelle_Irwin annabelle NNP 0 PERSON , , , , a DT a a retired JJ retir retired 0.0909090909090909 Iowa NNP Iowa Iowa NNP 1 LOCATION State NNP State State English_professor NN English_professor english who WP who who 4.4404973357016E-4 drew VBD drew draw 0.0158730158730159 on IN on on her PRP$ her she experience NN experi experience 0.00390625 as IN as as a DT a a high JJ high high 0.0018796992481203 school_teacher NN school_teach school in IN in in collaborating VBG collabor collaborate on IN on on an DT an an acclaimed JJ acclaim acclaimed series NN seri series 0.00819672131147541 of IN of of books NNS book book 0.0104166666666667 for IN for for young JJ young young 0.00274725274725275 teen-agers NNS teen-ag teen-agers , , , , died VBD di die 0.015625 Sept. NNP Sept. Sept. 13 CD 13 13 at IN at at a DT a a daughter NN daughter daughter 0.0138888888888889 's POS 's 's home NN home home 0.00196850393700787 in IN in in Des_Moines NNP Des_Moin des NNP 2 LOCATION , , , , Iowa NNP Iowa Iowa NNP 3 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Annabelle_Irwin)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ retired) (NNP Iowa) (NNP State) (NN English_professor)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD drew) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP$ her) (NN experience))) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT a) (NN high_school_teacher))) (PP (IN in) (S (VP (VBG collaborating) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ acclaimed) (NN series)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS books)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ young) (NNS teen-agers)))))))))))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD died) (NP-TMP (NNP Sept.) (CD 13)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NP (DT a) (NN daughter) (POS 's)) (NN home)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Des_Moines) (, ,) (NNP Iowa)))))) (. .)) IN_on 9 12 IN_as 9 15 IN_in 9 17 IN_on 17 21 IN_of 21 23 IN_for 23 26 IN_at 28 35 IN_in 35 39 nsubj 28 1 det 7 3 amod 7 4 nn 7 5 nn 7 6 appos 1 7 rel 9 8 nsubj 9 7 rcmod 7 9 poss 12 11 det 15 14 det 21 19 amod 21 20 amod 26 25 tmod 28 29 num 29 30 det 33 32 poss 35 33 dep 39 37 argm-loc 9 17 argm-mnr 9 16 arg1 9 12 arg0 9 7 arg0 9 8 arg2 18 22 arg0 18 7 arg0 18 8 argm-loc 29 36 arg1 29 1 Did Irwin teach high school in Iowa? Irwin did teach high school in Iowa . Irwin NNP Irwin Irwin NNP 0 PERSON did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 teach VB teach teach 0.0294117647058824 high_school NN high_school high in IN in in Iowa NNP Iowa Iowa NNP 1 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Irwin)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB teach) (NP (NN high_school)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Iowa))))) (. .)) IN_in 3 6 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 dobj 3 4 arg0 2 1 arg1 2 3 arg0 3 1 arg1 3 4 argm-loc 3 6 The board frequently has engaged in public disputes and has been accused by the federal court of making decisions based on narrow agendas and meddling where it shouldn't. The board frequently has engaged in public disputes and has been accused by the federal court of making decisions based on narrow agendas and meddling where it should n't . The DT The the board NN board board 0.00584795321637427 frequently RB frequent frequently 0.010989010989011 has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 engaged VBN engag engage 0.0303030303030303 in IN in in public JJ public public 0.00319488817891374 disputes NNS disput dispute 0.142857142857143 and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 been VBN been be 1.0 accused VBN accus accuse 0.05 by IN by by the DT the the federal_court NN federal_court federal of IN of of making VBG make make 0.00423728813559322 decisions NNS decis decision 0.0192307692307692 based VBN base base 0.0078740157480315 on IN on on narrow JJ narrow narrow 0.0163934426229508 agendas NNS agenda agenda and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 meddling VBG meddl meddle 0.25 where WRB where where 0.00106837606837607 it PRP it it should MD should should 0.0434782608695652 n't RB n't not . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN board)) (ADVP (RB frequently)) (VP (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN engaged) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ public) (NNS disputes))))) (CC and) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN accused) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN federal_court)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VP (VBG making) (NP (NNS decisions)) (PP (VBN based) (PP (IN on) (NP (JJ narrow) (NNS agendas))))) (CC and) (VP (VBG meddling) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD should) (RB n't)))))))))))))) (. .)) IN_in 5 8 agent 12 15 IN_of 15 17 IN_on 19 22 det 2 1 nsubjpass 5 2 advmod 5 3 aux 5 4 amod 8 7 aux 12 10 auxpass 12 11 and 5 12 det 15 14 dobj 17 18 dep 17 19 amod 22 21 and 17 24 advmod 27 25 nsubj 27 26 ccomp 24 27 neg 27 28 arg1 4 5 argm-tmp 4 3 arg0 4 2 arg2 5 8 argm-tmp 5 3 arg0 5 2 arg1 10 12 argm-tmp 10 3 arg0 10 2 argm-tmp 11 3 arg1 11 2 arg0 12 15 argm-tmp 12 3 arg1 12 2 argm-mnr 17 22 arg1 17 18 arg2 19 22 arg1 24 27 Does the board often make decisions based on narrow agendas? The board often does make decisions based on narrow agendas . The DT The the board NN board board 0.00584795321637427 often RB often often 0.002710027100271 does VBZ doe do 0.00215982721382289 make VB make make 0.00161550888529887 decisions NNS decis decision 0.0192307692307692 based VBN base base 0.0078740157480315 on IN on on narrow JJ narrow narrow 0.0163934426229508 agendas NNS agenda agenda . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN board)) (ADVP (RB often)) (VP (VBZ does) (VP (VB make) (NP (NNS decisions)) (PP (VBN based) (PP (IN on) (NP (JJ narrow) (NNS agendas)))))) (. .)) IN_on 7 10 det 2 1 nsubj 5 2 advmod 5 3 aux 5 4 dobj 5 6 dep 5 7 amod 10 9 arg0 4 2 arg1 4 5 argm-tmp 4 3 argm-mnr 5 10 arg0 5 2 arg1 5 6 argm-tmp 5 3 arg2 7 10 Fabric awning prices are more varied than aluminum awning prices, according to Kevin Tatman, owner of Merit Awnings in Dayton. Merit, in business since 1979, has always sold aluminum awnings and started selling Sunbrela brand fabric awnings about eight years ago. Fabric awning prices are more varied than aluminum awning prices , according to Kevin Tatman , owner of Merit Awnings in Dayton . Fabric NN Fabric fabric 0.0666666666666667 awning NN awn awning prices NNS price price 0.0163934426229508 are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 more RBR more more 8.93655049151028E-4 varied VBN vari vary 0.0588235294117647 than IN than than aluminum NN aluminum aluminum 0.0555555555555556 awning VBG awn awn prices NNS price price 0.0163934426229508 , , , , according VBG accord accord 0.00719424460431655 to TO to to Kevin_Tatman NNP Kevin_Tatman kevin NNP 0 PERSON , , , , owner NN owner owner 0.0294117647058824 of IN of of Merit_Awnings NNP Merit_Awn merit NNP 1 ORGANIZATION in IN in in Dayton NNP Dayton Dayton NNP 2 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NN Fabric) (NN awning) (NNS prices)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RBR more) (VBN varied) (PP (IN than) (NP (NN aluminum) (VBG awning) (NNS prices)))) (, ,) (PP (VBG according) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNP Kevin_Tatman)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NN owner)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Merit_Awnings)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Dayton)))))))))) (. .)) IN_than 6 10 IN_to 12 14 IN_of 16 18 IN_in 18 20 nn 3 1 nn 3 2 nsubj 6 3 cop 6 4 advmod 6 5 dep 10 8 amod 10 9 dep 6 12 appos 14 16 arg2 4 6 argm-adv 4 14 arg1 4 3 arg1 6 3 argm-ext 6 5 arg0 9 8 arg1 9 10 arg2 12 14 arg1 12 3 Merit , in business since 1979 , has always sold aluminum awnings and started selling Sunbrela brand fabric awnings about eight years ago . Merit NN Merit merit 0.0384615384615385 , , , , in IN in in business NN busi business 0.00275482093663912 since IN sinc since 1979 CD 1979 1979 CD 0 DATE 01/01/1979 , , , , has VBZ ha have 4.12201154163232E-4 always RB alwai always 0.0021978021978022 sold VBN sold sell 0.0384615384615385 aluminum NN aluminum aluminum 0.0555555555555556 awnings NNS awn awning 0.5 and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 started VBD start start 0.00704225352112676 selling VBG sell sell 0.0454545454545455 Sunbrela NNP Sunbrela Sunbrela NNP 1 ORGANIZATION brand NN brand brand 0.0526315789473684 fabric NN fabric fabric 0.0666666666666667 awnings NNS awn awning 0.5 about RB about about 0.00380228136882129 eight CD eight eight CD 2 DATE 01/01/1000 years NNS year year 0.0010515247108307 NNS 3 DATE 01/01/1000 ago RB ago ago 0.00645161290322581 RB 4 DATE 01/01/1000 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN Merit)) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN business)) (PP (IN since) (NP (CD 1979))))) (, ,)) (VP (VP (VBZ has) (ADVP (RB always)) (VP (VBN sold) (NP (NN aluminum) (NNS awnings)))) (CC and) (VP (VBD started) (S (VP (VBG selling) (NP (NNP Sunbrela) (NN brand) (NN fabric) (NNS awnings)) (ADVP (NP (QP (RB about) (CD eight)) (NNS years)) (RB ago)))))) (. .)) IN_in 1 4 IN_since 4 6 nsubj 10 1 aux 10 8 advmod 10 9 nn 12 11 dobj 10 12 and 10 14 partmod 14 15 xcomp 14 15 nn 19 16 nn 19 17 nn 19 18 dobj 15 19 dep 21 20 num 22 21 dep 23 22 advmod 15 23 arg1 8 10 argm-tmp 8 9 arg0 8 1 arg1 10 12 argm-tmp 10 9 arg0 10 1 arg1 14 15 arg0 14 1 argm-tmp 15 23 arg1 15 19 arg0 15 1 Are fabric awning prices more varied than aluminum awning prices? Fabric are awning prices more varied than aluminum awning prices . Fabric NN Fabric fabric 0.0666666666666667 are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 awning VBG awn awn prices NNS price price 0.0163934426229508 more RBR more more 8.93655049151028E-4 varied VBN vari vary 0.0588235294117647 than IN than than aluminum NN aluminum aluminum 0.0555555555555556 awning NN awn awning prices NNS price price 0.0163934426229508 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NN Fabric)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG awning) (S (NP (NNS prices)) (ADJP (RBR more) (VBN varied) (PP (IN than) (NP (NN aluminum) (NN awning) (NNS prices))))))) (. .)) IN_than 6 10 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 nsubj 6 4 advmod 6 5 xcomp 3 6 nn 10 8 nn 10 9 arg1 2 1 arg1 2 3 arg1 3 4 arg0 3 1 arg2 3 6 arg1 6 4 argm-ext 6 5 Increasingly, health experts and researchers are naming the nation's penchant for large portions and "supersizing" as a leading cause of obesity. Increasingly , health experts and researchers are naming the nation 's penchant for large portions and `` supersizing '' as a leading cause of obesity . Increasingly RB Increasingli increasingly 0.0238095238095238 , , , , health NN health health 0.0114942528735632 experts NNS expert expert 0.0263157894736842 and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 researchers NNS research researcher 0.25 are VBP ar be 0.0169491525423729 naming VBG name name 0.333333333333333 the DT the the nation NN nation nation 0.00666666666666667 's POS 's 's penchant NN penchant penchant 1.0 for IN for for large JJ larg large 0.0026525198938992 portions NNS portion portion 0.0909090909090909 and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 `` `` `` `` supersizing VBG supers supersize '' '' '' '' as IN as as a DT a a leading JJ lead leading 0.142857142857143 cause NN caus cause 0.0120481927710843 of IN of of obesity NN obes obesity 0.25 . . . . (ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Increasingly)) (, ,) (NP (NN health) (NNS experts) (CC and) (NNS researchers)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VP (VBG naming) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN nation) (POS 's)) (NN penchant)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ large) (NNS portions))))) (CC and) (VP (`` ``) (VBG supersizing) ('' '') (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ leading) (NN cause)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN obesity)))))))) (. .)) IN_for 12 15 IN_as 18 23 IN_of 23 25 advmod 8 1 nn 4 3 nsubj 8 4 and 4 6 aux 8 7 det 10 9 poss 12 10 dobj 8 12 amod 15 14 and 8 18 det 23 21 amod 23 22 argm-adv 7 1 arg1 7 8 arg1 7 4 argm-dis 8 1 arg1 8 12 arg0 8 4 arg1 18 23 argm-dis 18 1 arg0 18 4 Does supersizing cause obesity? Supersizing does cause obesity . Supersizing NNP Supers Supersizing does VBZ doe do 0.00215982721382289 cause VB caus cause 0.024390243902439 obesity RB obes obesity . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Supersizing)) (VP (VBZ does) (VP (VB cause) (ADVP (RB obesity)))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 advmod 3 4 arg0 2 1 arg1 2 3 arg0 3 1 argm-mnr 3 4 Dual-core chips can do the same work that a single-core chip can, only faster, while consuming less power and at a cooler temperature. Dual-core chips can do the same work that a single-core chip can , only faster , while consuming less power and at a cooler temperature . Dual-core JJ Dual-cor dual-core chips NNS chip chip 0.333333333333333 can MD can can 0.0285714285714286 do VB do do 0.00130208333333333 the DT the the same JJ same same 0.00147275405007364 work NN work work 0.00166112956810631 that IN that that a DT a a single-core JJ single-cor single-core chip NN chip chip 0.0588235294117647 can MD can can 0.0285714285714286 , , , , only RB onli only 6.88231245698555E-4 faster RBR faster faster 0.1 , , , , while IN while while consuming VBZ consum consume less JJR less less 0.00393700787401575 power NN power power 0.00294985250737463 and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 at IN at at a DT a a cooler JJR cooler cooler 1.0 temperature NN temperatur temperature 0.0075187969924812 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (JJ Dual-core) (NNS chips)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB do) (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN work)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT a) (JJ single-core) (NN chip)) (VP (MD can) (, ,) (ADVP (RB only) (RBR faster)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN while) (S (VP (VBZ consuming) (UCP (NP (JJR less) (NN power)) (CC and) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT a) (JJR cooler) (NN temperature)))))))))))) (. .)) amod 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 det 7 5 amod 7 6 dobj 4 7 complm 12 8 det 11 9 amod 11 10 nsubj 12 11 ccomp 4 12 rcmod 7 12 advmod 12 14 dep 14 15 mark 18 17 advcl 12 18 amod 20 19 dep 18 20 and 20 22 det 25 23 amod 25 24 dep 22 25 arg1 4 7 argm-mnr 4 12 argm-mod 4 3 arg0 4 2 arg0 18 11 arg1 18 20 Do dual-core chips consume more power than single-core chips? Dual-core chips do consume more power than single-core chips . Dual-core JJ Dual-cor dual-core chips NNS chip chip 0.333333333333333 do VBP do do 0.00170068027210884 consume VB consum consume 1.0 more JJR more more 9.23361034164358E-4 power NN power power 0.00294985250737463 than IN than than single-core JJ single-cor single-core chips NNS chip chip 0.333333333333333 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (JJ Dual-core) (NNS chips)) (VP (VBP do) (VP (VB consume) (NP (JJR more) (NN power)) (PP (IN than) (NP (JJ single-core) (NNS chips))))) (. .)) IN_than 4 9 amod 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 amod 6 5 dobj 4 6 amod 9 8 arg1 3 4 arg0 3 2 arg0 4 2 arg1 4 6 Duke initially planned on giving every new student a free iPod, but now only plans on giving iPods to students in certain classes. Duke initially planned on giving every new student a free iPod , but now only plans on giving iPods to students in certain classes . Duke NNP Duke Duke NNP 0 ORGANIZATION initially RB initi initially 0.0555555555555556 planned VBD plan plan 0.0476190476190476 on IN on on giving VBG give give 0.0105263157894737 every DT everi every new JJ new new 9.31098696461825E-4 student NN student student 0.00862068965517241 a DT a a free JJ free free 0.00374531835205993 iPod NN iPod ipod , , , , but CC but but 7.30460189919649E-4 now RB now now 7.71010023130301E-4 only RB onli only 6.88231245698555E-4 plans VBZ plan plan 0.0909090909090909 on IN on on giving VBG give give 0.0105263157894737 iPods NNS iPod ipods to TO to to students NNS student student 0.004739336492891 in IN in in certain JJ certain certain 0.0033003300330033 classes NNS class class 0.0120481927710843 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Duke)) (ADVP (RB initially)) (VP (VP (VBD planned) (PP (IN on) (S (VP (VBG giving) (NP (DT every) (JJ new) (NN student)) (NP (DT a) (JJ free) (NN iPod)))))) (, ,) (CC but) (ADVP (RB now)) (VP (ADVP (RB only)) (VBZ plans) (PP (IN on) (S (VP (VBG giving) (NP (NNS iPods)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNS students)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ certain) (NNS classes)))))))))) (. .)) IN_on 3 5 IN_on 16 18 IN_to 18 21 IN_in 21 24 nsubj 3 1 advmod 3 2 det 8 6 amod 8 7 iobj 5 8 det 11 9 amod 11 10 dobj 5 11 advmod 3 14 but 3 14 advmod 16 15 but 3 16 dobj 18 19 amod 24 23 argm-tmp 3 14 arg0 3 1 argm-tmp 3 2 arg1 3 5 arg0 5 1 arg1 5 11 arg2 5 8 arg0 16 1 arg1 16 18 argm-tmp 16 2 argm-adv 16 15 arg0 18 1 arg2 18 21 arg1 18 19 Does Duke plan on giving every new student a free iPod? Does_Duke plan on giving every new student a free iPod ? Does_Duke NNP Does_Duk does plan VBP plan plan 0.0588235294117647 on IN on on giving VBG give give 0.0105263157894737 every DT everi every new JJ new new 9.31098696461825E-4 student NN student student 0.00862068965517241 a DT a a free JJ free free 0.00374531835205993 iPod NN iPod ipod ? . ? ? (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Does_Duke)) (VP (VBP plan) (PP (IN on) (S (VP (VBG giving) (NP (DT every) (JJ new) (NN student)) (NP (DT a) (JJ free) (NN iPod)))))) (. ?)) IN_on 2 4 nsubj 2 1 det 7 5 amod 7 6 iobj 4 7 det 10 8 amod 10 9 dobj 4 10 arg1 2 4 arg0 2 1 arg2 4 7 arg1 4 10 arg0 4 1 A US judge late on Thursday threw out Mr Kerkorian's claims that Daimler had fraudulently described the 1998 deal bringing together Daimler-Benz and Chrysler as a merger rather than a takeover to avoid paying a premium. A US judge late on Thursday threw out Mr Kerkorian 's claims that Daimler had fraudulently described the 1998 deal bringing together Daimler-Benz and Chrysler as a merger rather than a takeover to avoid paying a premium . A DT A a US NNP US US NNP 0 LOCATION judge NN judg judge 0.0416666666666667 late RB late late 0.0222222222222222 on IN on on Thursday NNP Thursdai Thursday NNP 1 DATE 01/01/1000 threw VBD threw throw 0.0217391304347826 out IN out out Mr_Kerkorian NNP Mr_Kerkorian mr NNP 2 PERSON 's POS 's 's claims NNS claim claim 0.0222222222222222 that IN that that Daimler NNP Daimler Daimler NNP 3 PERSON had VBD had have 2.02634245187437E-4 fraudulently RB fraudul fraudulently described VBN describ describe 0.0116279069767442 the DT the the 1998 CD 1998 1998 CD 4 DATE 01/01/1998 deal NN deal deal 0.0106382978723404 bringing_together VBG bringing_togeth bringing Daimler-Benz NNP Daimler-Benz Daimler-Benz NNP 5 PERSON and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 Chrysler NNP Chrysler Chrysler NNP 6 ORGANIZATION as IN as as a DT a a merger NN merger merger 0.05 rather RB rather rather 0.00268096514745308 than IN than than a DT a a takeover NN takeov takeover 0.5 to TO to to avoid VB avoid avoid 0.0192307692307692 paying VBG pai pay 0.037037037037037 a DT a a premium NN premium premium 0.1 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (NNP US) (NN judge)) (ADVP (RB late) (PP (IN on) (NP-TMP (NNP Thursday)))) (VP (VBD threw) (PP (IN out) (NP (NP (NNP Mr_Kerkorian) (POS 's)) (NNS claims))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP Daimler)) (VP (VBD had) (ADVP (RB fraudulently)) (VP (VBN described) (NP (DT the) (CD 1998) (NN deal)) (S (VP (VBG bringing_together) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Daimler-Benz) (CC and) (NNP Chrysler)) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT a) (NN merger)))) (CONJP (RB rather) (IN than)) (NP (DT a) (NN takeover))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB avoid) (S (VP (VBG paying) (NP (DT a) (NN premium)))))))))))))) (. .)) IN_on 4 6 IN_out 7 11 IN_as 21 26 det 3 1 nn 3 2 nsubj 7 3 advmod 7 4 poss 11 9 complm 16 12 nsubj 16 13 aux 16 14 advmod 16 15 ccomp 7 16 det 19 17 num 19 18 dobj 16 19 partmod 16 20 dobj 20 21 iobj 20 21 and 21 23 det 26 25 dep 27 28 det 30 29 negcc 21 30 aux 32 31 purpcl 20 32 partmod 32 33 xcomp 32 33 det 35 34 dobj 33 35 argm-tmp 7 4 arg1 7 16 arg0 7 3 arg2 7 11 arg0 14 13 arg1 14 16 argm-mnr 14 15 arg0 16 13 argm-mnr 16 15 argm-adv 16 20 arg1 16 19 arg0 20 13 arg1 20 21 argm-pnc 20 32 arg0 32 13 arg1 32 33 arg1 33 35 Does the judge think Daimler fraudlently described the 1998 deal to avoid paying a premium? The judge does think Daimler fraudlently described the 1998 deal to avoid paying a premium . The DT The the judge NN judg judge 0.0416666666666667 does VBZ doe do 0.00215982721382289 think VB think think 0.00490196078431373 Daimler NNP Daimler Daimler NNP 0 PERSON fraudlently RB fraudlent fraudlently described VBD describ describe 0.0294117647058824 the DT the the 1998 CD 1998 1998 CD 1 DATE 01/01/1998 deal NN deal deal 0.0106382978723404 to TO to to avoid VB avoid avoid 0.0192307692307692 paying VBG pai pay 0.037037037037037 a DT a a premium NN premium premium 0.1 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN judge)) (VP (VBZ does) (S (VP (VB think) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Daimler)) (ADVP (RB fraudlently)) (VP (VBD described) (NP (DT the) (CD 1998) (NN deal)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB avoid) (S (VP (VBG paying) (NP (DT a) (NN premium))))))))))))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 3 2 ccomp 3 4 nsubj 7 5 advmod 7 6 ccomp 4 7 det 10 8 num 10 9 dobj 7 10 aux 12 11 purpcl 7 12 partmod 12 13 xcomp 12 13 det 15 14 dobj 13 15 arg0 3 2 arg1 3 4 arg1 4 7 arg0 4 2 argm-mnr 7 6 arg0 7 5 arg1 7 10 argm-pnc 7 12 arg0 12 5 arg1 12 13 arg1 13 15 A US judge late on Thursday threw out Mr Kerkorian's claims that Daimler had fraudulently described the 1998 deal bringing together Daimler-Benz and Chrysler as a merger rather than a takeover to avoid paying a premium. A US judge late on Thursday threw out Mr Kerkorian 's claims that Daimler had fraudulently described the 1998 deal bringing together Daimler-Benz and Chrysler as a merger rather than a takeover to avoid paying a premium . A DT A a US NNP US US NNP 0 LOCATION judge NN judg judge 0.0416666666666667 late RB late late 0.0222222222222222 on IN on on Thursday NNP Thursdai Thursday NNP 1 DATE 01/01/1000 threw VBD threw throw 0.0217391304347826 out IN out out Mr_Kerkorian NNP Mr_Kerkorian mr NNP 2 PERSON 's POS 's 's claims NNS claim claim 0.0222222222222222 that IN that that Daimler NNP Daimler Daimler NNP 3 PERSON had VBD had have 2.02634245187437E-4 fraudulently RB fraudul fraudulently described VBN describ describe 0.0116279069767442 the DT the the 1998 CD 1998 1998 CD 4 DATE 01/01/1998 deal NN deal deal 0.0106382978723404 bringing_together VBG bringing_togeth bringing Daimler-Benz NNP Daimler-Benz Daimler-Benz NNP 5 PERSON and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 Chrysler NNP Chrysler Chrysler NNP 6 ORGANIZATION as IN as as a DT a a merger NN merger merger 0.05 rather RB rather rather 0.00268096514745308 than IN than than a DT a a takeover NN takeov takeover 0.5 to TO to to avoid VB avoid avoid 0.0192307692307692 paying VBG pai pay 0.037037037037037 a DT a a premium NN premium premium 0.1 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (NNP US) (NN judge)) (ADVP (RB late) (PP (IN on) (NP-TMP (NNP Thursday)))) (VP (VBD threw) (PP (IN out) (NP (NP (NNP Mr_Kerkorian) (POS 's)) (NNS claims))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP Daimler)) (VP (VBD had) (ADVP (RB fraudulently)) (VP (VBN described) (NP (DT the) (CD 1998) (NN deal)) (S (VP (VBG bringing_together) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Daimler-Benz) (CC and) (NNP Chrysler)) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT a) (NN merger)))) (CONJP (RB rather) (IN than)) (NP (DT a) (NN takeover))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB avoid) (S (VP (VBG paying) (NP (DT a) (NN premium)))))))))))))) (. .)) IN_on 4 6 IN_out 7 11 IN_as 21 26 det 3 1 nn 3 2 nsubj 7 3 advmod 7 4 poss 11 9 complm 16 12 nsubj 16 13 aux 16 14 advmod 16 15 ccomp 7 16 det 19 17 num 19 18 dobj 16 19 partmod 16 20 dobj 20 21 iobj 20 21 and 21 23 det 26 25 dep 27 28 det 30 29 negcc 21 30 aux 32 31 purpcl 20 32 partmod 32 33 xcomp 32 33 det 35 34 dobj 33 35 arg2 7 11 arg0 7 3 arg1 7 16 argm-tmp 7 4 arg0 14 13 argm-mnr 14 15 arg1 14 16 arg0 16 13 argm-mnr 16 15 arg1 16 19 argm-adv 16 20 argm-pnc 20 32 arg1 20 21 arg0 20 13 arg0 32 13 arg1 32 33 arg1 33 35 Does Mr Kerkorian think Daimler fraudlently described the 1998 deal to avoid paying a premium? Mr_Kerkorian does think Daimler fraudlently described the 1998 deal to avoid paying a premium . Mr_Kerkorian NNP Mr_Kerkorian mr does VBZ doe do 0.00215982721382289 think VB think think 0.00490196078431373 Daimler NNP Daimler Daimler NNP 0 PERSON fraudlently RB fraudlent fraudlently described VBD describ describe 0.0294117647058824 the DT the the 1998 CD 1998 1998 CD 1 DATE 01/01/1998 deal NN deal deal 0.0106382978723404 to TO to to avoid VB avoid avoid 0.0192307692307692 paying VBG pai pay 0.037037037037037 a DT a a premium NN premium premium 0.1 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Mr_Kerkorian)) (VP (VBZ does) (S (VP (VB think) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Daimler)) (ADVP (RB fraudlently)) (VP (VBD described) (NP (DT the) (CD 1998) (NN deal)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB avoid) (S (VP (VBG paying) (NP (DT a) (NN premium))))))))))))) (. .)) nsubj 2 1 ccomp 2 3 nsubj 6 4 advmod 6 5 ccomp 3 6 det 9 7 num 9 8 dobj 6 9 aux 11 10 purpcl 6 11 partmod 11 12 xcomp 11 12 det 14 13 dobj 12 14 arg0 2 1 arg1 2 3 arg0 3 1 arg1 3 6 argm-pnc 6 11 arg1 6 9 arg0 6 4 argm-mnr 6 5 arg0 11 4 arg1 11 12 arg1 12 14 MG Rover is on the brink of collapse after Britain refused to provide $100 million in emergency funding and component suppliers withdrew their support, forcing the car-maker to halt production. MG Rover is on the brink of collapse after Britain refused to provide $ 100 million in emergency funding and component suppliers withdrew their support , forcing the car-maker to halt production . MG_Rover NNP MG_Rover mg NNP 0 ORGANIZATION is VBZ is be 0.0101010101010101 on IN on on the DT the the brink NN brink brink 0.333333333333333 of IN of of collapse NN collaps collapse 0.166666666666667 after IN after after Britain NNP Britain Britain NNP 1 LOCATION refused VBD refus refuse 0.0217391304347826 to TO to to provide VB provid provide 0.00609756097560976 $ $ $ $ $ 2 MONEY $1.0E8 100 CD 100 100 CD 3 MONEY $1.0E8 million CD million million CD 4 MONEY $1.0E8 in IN in in emergency NN emerg emergency 0.0303030303030303 funding NN fund funding and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 component NN compon component 0.0384615384615385 suppliers NNS supplier supplier 0.5 withdrew VBD withdrew withdraw 0.111111111111111 their PRP$ their their support NN support support 0.0080 , , , , forcing VBG forc force 0.0769230769230769 the DT the the car-maker NN car-mak car-maker to TO to to halt VB halt halt 0.166666666666667 production NN product production 0.00675675675675676 . . . . (ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP MG_Rover)) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN brink)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN collapse))))) (SBAR (IN after) (S (NP (NNP Britain)) (VP (VBD refused) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB provide) (NP (NP (QP ($ $) (CD 100) (CD million))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN emergency) (NN funding)))))))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (NN component) (NNS suppliers)) (VP (VBD withdrew) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN support)) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG forcing) (NP (DT the) (NN car-maker) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB halt) (NP (NN production)))))))))) (. .)) IN_on 2 5 IN_of 5 7 IN_in 13 18 nsubj 2 1 det 5 4 mark 10 8 nsubj 10 9 xsubj 12 9 advcl 2 10 aux 12 11 purpcl 10 12 xcomp 10 12 dobj 12 13 number 13 14 number 13 15 nn 18 17 nn 21 20 nsubj 22 21 and 2 22 poss 24 23 dobj 22 24 partmod 22 26 det 28 27 dobj 26 28 aux 30 29 infmod 28 30 dobj 30 31 argm-tmp 2 10 arg2 2 5 arg1 2 1 arg1 10 12 arg0 10 9 arg0 12 9 arg1 12 13 arg1 22 24 argm-adv 22 26 arg0 22 21 arg0 26 21 arg1 26 28 arg0 30 21 arg1 30 31 Does MG Rover make cars? MG Rover does make cars . MG_Rover NNP MG_Rover mg NNP 0 ORGANIZATION does VBZ doe do 0.00215982721382289 make VB make make 0.00161550888529887 cars NNS car car 0.00892857142857143 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP MG_Rover)) (VP (VBZ does) (VP (VB make) (NP (NNS cars)))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 dobj 3 4 arg1 2 3 arg0 2 1 arg0 3 1 arg1 3 4 A World Trade Organization (WTO) appeals panel Thursday ruled that although the United States can continue with its restrictions on internet gambling, some of the rules imposed by the country were discriminatory to foreign operators. A World Trade Organization -LRB- WTO -RRB- appeals panel Thursday ruled that although the United States can continue with its restrictions on internet gambling , some of the rules imposed by the country were discriminatory to foreign operators . A DT A a World_Trade_Organization NNS World_Trade_Organ world -LRB- -LRB- -LRB- -lrb- WTO NNP WTO WTO NNP 0 ORGANIZATION -RRB- -RRB- -RRB- -rrb- appeals NNS appeal appeal 0.0769230769230769 panel NN panel panel 0.03125 Thursday NNP Thursdai Thursday NNP 1 DATE 01/01/1000 ruled VBD rule rule 0.0833333333333333 that IN that that although IN although although the DT the the United_States NNP United_St united NNP 2 LOCATION can MD can can 0.0285714285714286 continue VB continu continue 0.0131578947368421 with IN with with its PRP$ it its restrictions NNS restrict restriction 0.037037037037037 on IN on on internet JJ internet internet gambling NN gambl gambling 0.0769230769230769 , , , , some DT some some of IN of of the DT the the rules NNS rule rule 0.0136986301369863 imposed VBN impos impose 0.0526315789473684 by IN by by the DT the the country NN countri country 0.00317460317460317 were VBD were be discriminatory JJ discriminatori discriminatory 0.333333333333333 to TO to to foreign JJ foreign foreign 0.00689655172413793 operators NNS oper operator 0.0588235294117647 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (NP (NNS World_Trade_Organization) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NNP WTO) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (NNS appeals)) (NN panel)) (NP-TMP (NNP Thursday)) (VP (VBD ruled) (SBAR (IN that) (S (SBAR (IN although) (S (NP (DT the) (NNP United_States)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB continue) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP$ its) (NNS restrictions))) (PP (IN on) (NP (JJ internet) (NN gambling))))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT some)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS rules)) (VP (VBN imposed) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NN country))))))) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (JJ discriminatory) (PP (TO to) (NP (JJ foreign) (NNS operators)))))))) (. .)) IN_with 15 18 IN_on 15 21 IN_of 23 26 IN_by 27 30 IN_to 32 35 det 7 1 dep 6 2 abbrev 6 4 nn 7 6 nsubj 9 7 dep 9 8 complm 32 10 mark 15 11 det 13 12 nsubj 15 13 aux 15 14 advcl 32 15 poss 18 17 amod 21 20 nsubj 32 23 det 26 25 partmod 26 27 det 30 29 cop 32 31 ccomp 9 32 amod 35 34 arg0 9 7 arg1 9 32 arg1 15 13 argm-tmp 15 21 argm-mod 15 14 argm-mnr 15 18 arg1 27 26 arg0 27 30 argm-adv 31 15 arg1 31 23 arg2 31 32 Does the United States have internet gambling restrictions? The United_States does have internet gambling restrictions . The DT The the United_States NNPS United_St united does VBZ doe do 0.00215982721382289 have VB have have 5.98802395209581E-4 internet JJ internet internet gambling NN gambl gambling 0.0769230769230769 restrictions NNS restrict restriction 0.037037037037037 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNPS United_States)) (VP (VBZ does) (VP (VB have) (NP (JJ internet) (NN gambling) (NNS restrictions)))) (. .)) det 2 1 nsubj 4 2 aux 4 3 amod 7 5 nn 7 6 dobj 4 7 arg0 3 2 arg1 3 4 arg1 4 7 arg0 4 2 Video games have provided one of the last refuges from the ubiquitous advertising that hits consumers from every direction. Video games have provided one of the last refuges from the ubiquitous advertising that hits consumers from every direction . Video_games NNS Video_gam video have VBP have have 4.44839857651246E-4 provided VBN provid provide 0.0116279069767442 one CD on one of IN of of the DT the the last JJ last last 0.00151745068285281 refuges NNS refug refuge from IN from from the DT the the ubiquitous JJ ubiquit ubiquitous 0.5 advertising NN advertis advertising 0.0238095238095238 that WDT that that 5.64334085778781E-4 hits VBZ hit hit 0.125 consumers NNS consum consumer 0.111111111111111 from IN from from every DT everi every direction NN direct direction 0.00757575757575758 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Video_games)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN provided) (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ last) (NNS refuges)))) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ ubiquitous) (NN advertising)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ hits) (NP (NNS consumers)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT every) (NN direction)))))))))) (. .)) IN_of 4 8 IN_from 3 12 IN_from 14 18 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 dobj 3 4 det 8 6 amod 8 7 det 12 10 amod 12 11 rel 14 13 nsubj 14 12 rcmod 12 14 dobj 14 15 det 18 17 arg1 2 3 arg0 2 1 arg2 3 12 arg0 3 1 arg1 3 4 arg2 14 18 arg1 14 15 arg0 14 13 arg0 14 12 Do video games contain advertisements? Video games do contain advertisements . Video_games NNS Video_gam video do VBP do do 0.00170068027210884 contain VB contain contain 0.0454545454545455 advertisements NNS advertis advertisement 0.333333333333333 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Video_games)) (VP (VBP do) (VP (VB contain) (NP (NNS advertisements)))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 dobj 3 4 arg0 2 1 arg1 2 3 arg0 3 1 arg1 3 4 Bocelli grew up among the vineyards and olive groves of his estate in Lajatico, a community in rural Tuscany near Pisa. Bocelli grew up among the vineyards and olive groves of his estate in Lajatico , a community in rural Tuscany near Pisa . Bocelli NNP Bocelli Bocelli NNP 0 PERSON grew_up VBD grew_up grew among IN among among the DT the the vineyards NNS vineyard vineyard 0.2 and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 olive NN oliv olive groves NNS grove grove 1.0 of IN of of his PRP$ hi his estate NN estat estate 0.0208333333333333 in IN in in Lajatico NNP Lajatico Lajatico NNP 1 LOCATION , , , , a DT a a community NN commun community 0.00469483568075117 in IN in in rural JJ rural rural 0.0212765957446809 Tuscany NNP Tuscani Tuscany NNP 2 LOCATION near IN near near Pisa NNP Pisa Pisa NNP 3 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Bocelli)) (VP (VBD grew_up) (PP (IN among) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS vineyards) (CC and) (NN olive) (NNS groves)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN estate))))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP Lajatico)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN community)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ rural) (NNP Tuscany)))))) (PP (IN near) (NP (NNP Pisa)))) (. .)) IN_among 2 5 IN_of 5 11 IN_in 2 13 IN_in 16 19 IN_near 2 21 nsubj 2 1 det 5 4 nn 8 7 and 5 8 poss 11 10 det 16 15 appos 13 16 amod 19 18 argm-loc 2 8 argm-loc 2 13 argm-loc 2 21 arg1 2 1 Does Bocelli have a home in Tuscany? Bocelli does have a home in Tuscany . Bocelli NNP Bocelli Bocelli NNP 0 PERSON does VBZ doe do 0.00215982721382289 have VB have have 5.98802395209581E-4 a DT a a home NN home home 0.00196850393700787 in IN in in Tuscany NNP Tuscani Tuscany NNP 1 LOCATION . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Bocelli)) (VP (VBZ does) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN home)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Tuscany)))))) (. .)) IN_in 5 7 nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 det 5 4 dobj 3 5 arg0 2 1 arg1 2 3 arg1 3 5 arg0 3 1 Mike Campbell dented his car door in an accident on Friday. Mike Campbell dented his car door in an accident on Friday . Mike_Campbell NNP Mike_Campbel mike NNP 0 PERSON dented VBD dent dent 1.0 his PRP$ hi his car_door NN car_door car in IN in in an DT an an accident NN accid accident 0.032258064516129 on IN on on Friday NNP Fridai Friday NNP 1 DATE 01/01/1000 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Mike_Campbell)) (VP (VBD dented) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN car_door)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT an) (NN accident))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP Friday)))) (. .)) IN_in 2 7 IN_on 2 9 nsubj 2 1 poss 4 3 dobj 2 4 det 7 6 arg0 2 1 argm-mnr 2 7 argm-tmp 2 9 arg1 2 4 Does Mike's car have a dent? Does Mike 's car have a dent ? Does NNP Doe Does Mike NNP Mike Mike NNP 0 PERSON 's POS 's 's car NN car car 0.00366300366300366 have VBP have have 4.44839857651246E-4 a DT a a dent NN dent dent 1.0 ? . ? ? (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Does) (NNP Mike) (POS 's)) (NN car)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT a) (NN dent))) (. ?)) nn 2 1 poss 4 2 nsubj 5 4 det 7 6 dobj 5 7 arg0 5 4 arg1 5 7 Two sisters who know their mother had genetic testing before she died of ovarian cancer want to find out her test results. Two sisters who know their mother had genetic testing before she died of ovarian cancer want to find out her test results . Two CD Two two sisters NNS sister sister 0.0555555555555556 who WP who who 4.4404973357016E-4 know VBP know know 0.00268817204301075 their PRP$ their their mother NN mother mother 0.00512820512820513 had VBD had have 2.02634245187437E-4 genetic JJ genet genetic 0.2 testing NN test testing 0.032258064516129 before IN befor before she PRP she she died VBD di die 0.015625 of IN of of ovarian NN ovarian ovarian cancer NN cancer cancer 0.0476190476190476 want VBP want want 0.00442477876106195 to TO to to find_out VB find_out find her PRP$ her she test NN test test 0.0101010101010101 results NNS result result 0.00689655172413793 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (CD Two) (NNS sisters)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP$ their) (NN mother)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (JJ genetic) (NN testing)) (SBAR (IN before) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD died) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN ovarian) (NN cancer))))))))))))) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB find_out) (NP (PRP$ her) (NN test) (NNS results)))))) (. .)) IN_of 12 15 num 2 1 nsubj 16 2 xsubj 18 2 rel 4 3 nsubj 4 2 rcmod 2 4 poss 6 5 nsubj 7 6 ccomp 4 7 amod 9 8 dobj 7 9 mark 12 10 nsubj 12 11 advcl 7 12 nn 15 14 aux 18 17 purpcl 16 18 xcomp 16 18 poss 21 19 nn 21 20 dobj 18 21 arg0 4 2 arg0 4 3 arg1 4 7 arg0 7 6 argm-tmp 7 12 arg1 7 9 argm-cau 12 15 arg1 12 11 arg1 16 18 arg0 16 2 arg1 18 21 arg0 18 2 Did cancer cause their mother's death? Cancer did cause their mother 's death . Cancer NNP Cancer Cancer did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 cause VB caus cause 0.024390243902439 their PRP$ their their mother NN mother mother 0.00512820512820513 's POS 's 's death NN death death 0.003690036900369 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Cancer)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB cause) (NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN mother) (POS 's)) (NN death)))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 poss 5 4 poss 7 5 dobj 3 7 arg0 2 1 arg1 2 3 arg0 3 1 arg1 3 7 Marc Vaughn didn't kill the four hostages with a gun, he used a knife. Marc Vaughn did n't kill the four hostages with a gun , he used a knife . Marc_Vaughn NNP Marc_Vaughn marc NNP 0 PERSON did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 n't RB n't not kill VB kill kill 0.0181818181818182 the DT the the four CD four four hostages NNS hostag hostage 0.333333333333333 with IN with with a DT a a gun NN gun gun 0.00970873786407767 , , , , he PRP he he used VBD us use 0.00680272108843537 a DT a a knife NN knife knife 0.0136986301369863 . . . . (ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP Marc_Vaughn)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB kill) (NP (NP (DT the) (CD four) (NNS hostages)) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT a) (NN gun))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD used) (NP (DT a) (NN knife))) (. .)) IN_with 7 10 nsubj 4 1 aux 4 2 neg 4 3 ccomp 13 4 det 7 5 num 7 6 dobj 4 7 det 10 9 nsubj 13 12 det 15 14 dobj 13 15 arg0 2 1 arg1 2 4 arg0 4 1 arg1 4 7 argm-neg 4 3 arg0 13 12 arg1 13 15 Did Vaughn use a gun to kill the four hostages? Vaughn did use a gun to kill the four hostages . Vaughn NNP Vaughn Vaughn NNP 0 PERSON did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 use VB us use 0.0065359477124183 a DT a a gun NN gun gun 0.00970873786407767 to TO to to kill VB kill kill 0.0181818181818182 the DT the the four CD four four hostages NNS hostag hostage 0.333333333333333 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Vaughn)) (VP (VBD did) (VP (VB use) (NP (DT a) (NN gun) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB kill) (NP (DT the) (CD four) (NNS hostages)))))))) (. .)) nsubj 3 1 aux 3 2 det 5 4 dobj 3 5 aux 7 6 infmod 5 7 det 10 8 num 10 9 dobj 7 10 arg1 2 3 arg0 2 1 arg0 3 1 arg1 3 5 arg1 7 10 arg0 7 1 Early in the 1990s, Chinese officials made land available for a new hospital, and money for construction and operating costs. Early in the 1990s , Chinese officials made land available for a new hospital , and money for construction and operating costs . Early RB Earli early 0.00862068965517241 in IN in in the DT the the 1990s NNS 1990 1990 NNS 0 DATE 01/01/1990 , , , , Chinese NNP Chines Chinese NNP 1 LOCATION officials NNS offici official 0.0166666666666667 made VBD made make 0.00189753320683112 land NN land land 0.00518134715025907 available JJ avail available 0.00413223140495868 for IN for for a DT a a new JJ new new 9.31098696461825E-4 hospital NN hospit hospital 0.0128205128205128 , , , , and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 money NN monei money 0.00367647058823529 for IN for for construction NN construct construction 0.0105263157894737 and CC and and 0.00101936799184506 operating NN oper operating 0.0204081632653061 costs NNS cost cost 0.00632911392405063 . . . . (ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Early) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNS 1990s)))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Chinese) (NNS officials)) (VP (VBD made) (NP (NP (NP (NN land)) (ADJP (JJ available) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ new) (NN hospital))))) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (NN money)) (PP (IN for) (NP (UCP (NN construction) (CC and) (NN operating)) (NNS costs)))))) (. .)) IN_in 1 4 IN_for 10 14 IN_for 17 22 advmod 8 1 det 4 3 nn 7 6 nsubj 8 7 dobj 8 9 amod 9 10 det 14 12 amod 14 13 and 9 17 dep 22 19 and 19 21 arg0 8 7 arg1 8 9 argm-tmp 8 1 Did officials from China make land available for a new hospital? Officials from China did make land available for a new hospital . Officials NNS Official officials 0.0166666666666667 from IN from from China NNP China China NNP 0 LOCATION did VBD did do 0.142857142857143 make VB make make 0.00161550888529887 land NN land land 0.00518134715025907 available JJ avail available 0.00413223140495868 for IN for for a DT a a new JJ new new 9.31098696461825E-4 hospital NN hospit hospital 0.0128205128205128 . . . . (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Officials)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNP China)))) (VP (VBD did) (S (VP (VB make) (S (NP (NN land)) (ADJP (JJ available) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ new) (NN hospital)))))))) (. .)) IN_from 1 3 IN_for 7 11 nsubj 4 1 ccomp 4 5 nsubj 7 6 xcomp 5 7 det 11 9 amod 11 10 arg1 4 5 arg0 4 1 arg2 5 7 arg0 5 1 arg1 5 6